Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.3.0 release? #315

Closed
hobu opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #320
Closed

1.3.0 release? #315

hobu opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #320

Comments

@hobu
Copy link
Member

hobu commented Jun 10, 2024

@mwtoews with the release of libspatialindex 2.0.0, the current release of Rtree has tests that are broken (a version check). We should issue a new Rtree release.

Did you have any items you wanted to make sure were addressed or have any time to work some of the issues before we snapped off the release?

@adamjstewart
Copy link
Collaborator

If there are no new features/API changes and only bug fixes, shouldn't it be 1.2.1?

@hobu
Copy link
Member Author

hobu commented Jun 10, 2024

shouldn't it be 1.2.1?

No strong opinion but given our release cadence being so slow, I thought a major version number would also align with prompting an update to libspatialindex since they are so closely linked.

Our wheel generation stuff would also need to be updated to do libspatialindex 2.0.0

@mwtoews
Copy link
Member

mwtoews commented Jun 10, 2024

Unfortunately, I have limited time to address new features / resolve issues with Rtree. However, I can find some time this week to update the wheel generation for libspatialindex 2.0.0 and push out a new release.

As for the next logical version, I don't have any strong opinions. Since libspatialindex headers are included with binary wheels, probably a minor increment to 1.3.0 makes most sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants