Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transport.ticks: docs description small improvement #1121

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2022

Conversation

satelllte
Copy link
Contributor

@satelllte satelllte commented Sep 27, 2022

Makes the description a bit cleaner.
Docs reference: https://tonejs.github.io/docs/14.7.77/Transport#ticks

Thanks!

@satelllte satelllte changed the title Transport.ticks: docs typo fix Transport.ticks: docs description small improvement Sep 27, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1121 (37a1e41) into dev (ae0033d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #1121   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.43%   98.43%           
=======================================
  Files         184      184           
  Lines        7710     7710           
  Branches      679      679           
=======================================
  Hits         7589     7589           
  Misses         34       34           
  Partials       87       87           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Tone/core/clock/Transport.ts 98.37% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@satelllte satelllte marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2022 16:50
@tambien tambien merged commit 4d8ab82 into Tonejs:dev Oct 2, 2022
@satelllte satelllte deleted the docs-transport-ticks branch October 2, 2022 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants