Skip to content

Move of module utbot-python-types into a separate repository #2734

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

tochilinak
Copy link
Member

Description

Moved module utbot-python-types here: https://github.com/UnitTestBot/PythonTypesAPI.

Now the module is picked by UTBot with jitpack. The commit hash is specified in gradle.properties of the project.

How to test

All standard checks for utbot-python. Behaviour should not have changed.

Self-check list

Check off the item if the statement is true. Hint: [x] is a marked item.

Please do not delete the list or its items.

  • I've set the proper labels for my PR (at least, for category and component).
  • PR title and description are clear and intelligible.
  • I've added enough comments to my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • The functionality I've repaired, changed or added is covered with automated tests.
  • Manual tests have been provided optionally.
  • The documentation for the functionality I've been working on is up-to-date.

@tochilinak tochilinak added ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request lang-python Issue is related to python support labels Feb 20, 2024
@tochilinak tochilinak self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@tochilinak tochilinak merged commit 7f10da6 into main Feb 21, 2024
@tochilinak tochilinak deleted the tochilinak/python-types-move branch February 21, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request lang-python Issue is related to python support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants