Skip to content

v0.4.9

Choose a tag to compare

@github-actions github-actions released this 30 Sep 08:39
· 40 commits to main since this release
v0.4.9
dd9f93e

Wikipedia can be read again, and a verdict now says more about how much it rests
on: an abstract, or a claim too short to pin down. The Tavily key is pasted straight
into /config.

Added

  • Tavily API: in /config. The search section of the settings panel has a key
    row: press Enter, paste the key, Enter again. It is saved to the .env in your
    config directory (mode 0600 on macOS/Linux), never to config.toml or the project's
    .env, and it is never shown: the row says only whether a key is saved and where.
    Backspace removes it. Saving a key does not turn search on: while
    search.provider is not tavily the row says the key is unused, and with
    tavily selected and no key it says one is needed.
  • A note on claims too short to pin down. A claim like "openai won" is supported
    by almost any page about any win. A claim with two content words or fewer, and no
    linking verb (is, are, was, …) between them, now carries a "short claim"
    note on each of its verdict rows, SARIF included. The note tells you to check
    that the quoted passage is about the event you meant. It is a rule, not a model,
    and it changes no verdict, tier or exit code.

Fixed

  • Wikipedia pages no longer read as UNVERIFIED (blocked). The bot-wall check
    matched captcha inside MediaWiki's inline configuration script, so every Wikipedia
    page was reported blocked at all four ladder steps despite answering 200. Challenge
    phrases are now matched outside <script>/<style> contents and only on small
    pages. cf-chl and Cloudflare's _cf_chl_opt still mark a wall wherever they
    appear. Other cf_chl tokens (such as __cf_chl_f_tk) count only on small
    pages, because they linger in the URLs of real articles.
  • A verdict judged against an abstract now says so on its own row. A short page
    or an abstract-only source already had its LOW CONFIDENCE (abstract only) row, but
    the claim's verdict row (SUPPORTED (found by proofpath), NOT SUPPORTED, …) did
    not, so read alone it looked like a full-text verdict. It now carries "judged
    against the abstract only, not the full text", in the terminal, Markdown, JSON and
    SARIF.