Feedback wanted: Functions tab and Tree view

[abhiramshaji-cyber]

Architect now opens on a Functions tab. I would really like to hear whether it helps you, and where it falls short.

What it does

• List. Every function in the project, with its line count, an importance score from 1 to 5, and a one line description. You can sort by importance, lines or name, and filter by name, file or description.
• Importance with no AI. The score comes from PageRank over the call graph plus a few plain facts (is it exported, is it a starting point, how many functions call it). Descriptions come from the author's own comments, or from the function name when there is no comment. There is no API key and no model call. It takes about 3 ms for 1,300 functions.
• Tree. An org chart of who calls whom, from the starting points of the program down. You can open and close branches, search, and zoom.

What I would like to know

1. What did you point it at, and did the top of the list match the functions you would call important? Which ones felt wrong?
2. Was the Tree view useful for finding your way around a codebase you did not write, or did it get too wide to read?
3. Were the descriptions good enough when there were no comments to draw from?
4. Which OS and language should come next? Today I build and test it on macOS, and it reads TypeScript and JavaScript.

Release notes and install steps: https://github.com/abhiramshaji-cyber/Architect/releases/tag/v0.2.0

If you prefer a form, there is a feedback template: https://github.com/abhiramshaji-cyber/Architect/issues/new?template=feedback.yml

Any reply helps, even a single line. Thank you for trying it.