The Brunerie number is ±2 - direct proof #741
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aljungstrom
changed the title
aljungstrom
commented
Apr 7, 2022
mortberg
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a direct proof of the fact that the Brunerie number is ±2 (in fact, with my construction, it's -2). The proof itself is relatively straightforward (see Cubical.Homotopy.Group.Pi4S3.QuickProof -- you may suggest a better name...) but relies on some machinery concerning the equivalence
Sⁿ * Sᵐ ≃ Sⁿ⁺ᵐ. The idea is to formulate π₃(A) asπ*₃(A) := ∥ S¹ * S¹ →∙ A ∥₂(with an explicitly defined multiplication) and analyse the termη₁ : π₃*(S²)defining the Brunerie number as a member of this group. We can then prove directly that it gets mapped to -2 under what is pretty much the usual equivalenceπ₃(S²) ≅ ℤ.We get a bunch of terms corresponding to η on the way:
η₁ : π₃*(S²), η₂ : π₃*(S¹ * S¹), η₃ : π₃*(S³) , η₄ : π₃(S³)which we can try to send to ℤ. This gives equivalent, but hopefully simpler, computations of the Brunerie number (I haven't tried this yet).