Skip to content

Conversation

devin-ai-integration[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Fix Copy Page Dropdown 404 errors in production

Summary

This PR fixes the 404 errors occurring in production for the Copy Page Dropdown functionality by replacing runtime file system access with a pre-built JSON approach, following the same pattern used by the existing llms.txt route.

Root Cause: The original /api/page-content route used Node.js file system operations (readFile, join) and the gray-matter dependency at runtime, which don't work in the Cloudflare Workers environment.

Solution: Replace runtime file operations with imports from pre-built docs.json that's generated at build time by scripts/generate-docs-json.js, using the same pattern as app/llms.txt/route.ts.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

⚠️ High Priority - Production Deployment Testing

  • Test production build: Run npm run build and verify it completes without errors
  • Deploy to Cloudflare Workers: Actually deploy this change and test the API endpoints in production environment
  • Verify docs.json generation: Confirm that content/docs.json gets generated during the build process

Medium Priority - Functionality Testing

  • Test path matching edge cases: Try the copy functionality on various page types (Introduction, CLI pages, SDK pages) to ensure path matching works correctly
  • End-to-end copy testing: Use the "Copy as Markdown for LLMs" feature and verify the returned content is correct and complete

Diagram

%%{ init : { "theme" : "default" }}%%
flowchart TD
    Frontend["components/<br/>CopyPageDropdown.tsx"]:::context
    API["app/api/page-content/<br/>route.ts"]:::major-edit
    DocsJson["content/docs.json"]:::context
    BuildScript["scripts/<br/>generate-docs-json.js"]:::context
    ContentFiles["content/docs/<br/>*.mdx files"]:::context
    
    Frontend -->|"fetch('/api/page-content')"| API
    API -->|"import docsJson from"| DocsJson
    BuildScript -->|"generates at build time"| DocsJson
    BuildScript -->|"reads and parses"| ContentFiles
    
    subgraph Legend
        L1[Major Edit]:::major-edit
        L2[Minor Edit]:::minor-edit    
        L3[Context/No Edit]:::context
    end

classDef major-edit fill:#90EE90
classDef minor-edit fill:#87CEEB
classDef context fill:#FFFFFF
Loading

Notes

Key Changes Made:

  • Replaced import { readFile } from 'fs/promises' and import matter from 'gray-matter' with import docsJson from '@/content/docs.json'
  • Updated path matching logic to work with docs.json structure (removed docs/ prefix that wasn't needed)
  • Maintained identical API response format for frontend compatibility

Testing Completed:

  • ✅ Local development server testing
  • ✅ API calls return 200 status for Introduction and CLI/auth pages
  • ✅ Copy page dropdown UI functions correctly
  • ❌ Production build testing (build process got stuck)
  • ❌ Cloudflare Workers deployment testing

Potential Risks:

  • Build-time dependency on docs.json generation
  • Path matching logic changes may not cover all edge cases
  • TypeScript import errors need verification in production build

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/980312765f61444f9cb9d87e15fcf676
Requested by: @afterrburn

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved performance and reliability of page content retrieval by switching to a faster, in-memory lookup method.
    • Simplified logic for fetching and returning page content and metadata.
    • Enhanced error handling for missing content with clearer 404 responses.

- Replace runtime file system access with pre-built docs.json approach
- Follow same pattern as llms.txt route for Cloudflare Workers compatibility
- Maintain same API interface for frontend component
- Add path matching logic for both direct and index.mdx patterns

Fixes #239 production 404 errors by using build-time generated JSON
instead of Node.js fs operations that don't work in Cloudflare Workers.

Co-Authored-By: srith@agentuity.com <rithsenghorn@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The GET handler in app/api/page-content/route.ts was refactored to use a static, preloaded JSON object for document lookup, replacing dynamic file system reads and frontmatter parsing. The new implementation searches the JSON data for matching documents and returns their content and metadata, simplifying the previous logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
API Handler Refactor
app/api/page-content/route.ts
Replaced dynamic file system reads and frontmatter parsing with a static in-memory JSON lookup; simplified GET logic and error handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant APIHandler
    participant PreloadedJSON

    Client->>APIHandler: GET /api/page-content?path=...
    APIHandler->>PreloadedJSON: Lookup document by path
    alt Document found
        PreloadedJSON-->>APIHandler: Document object
        APIHandler-->>Client: 200 OK with content & metadata
    else Not found
        APIHandler-->>Client: 404 Not Found
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • afterrburn
  • jhaynie
  • rblalock

Poem

In memory now, the docs reside,
No more disk reads, nowhere to hide!
A JSON lookup, swift and bright,
Returns our pages day and night.
The code is lean, the logic clear—
A happy hop for all who peer!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch devin/1753972992-fix-copy-page-dropdown-404

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot requested review from jhaynie and rblalock July 31, 2025 14:51
Copy link

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Preview URL Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
docs 7d96592 Commit Preview URL

Branch Preview URL
Jul 31 2025, 02:52 PM

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/api/page-content/route.ts (1)

36-39: Response format maintains backward compatibility.

The response structure correctly preserves the API contract, ensuring frontend compatibility as intended.

For better type safety, consider using optional chaining:

return Response.json({
  content: doc.content,
-  title: doc.meta.title || '',
-  description: doc.meta.description || '',
+  title: (doc.meta.title as string) ?? '',
+  description: (doc.meta.description as string) ?? '',
  path
});

This makes the type casting explicit and uses nullish coalescing for cleaner fallback handling.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5eb9f16 and 7d96592.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/api/page-content/route.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: applies to agent-docs/**/src/agents/**/index.ts : the file should export a default function...
Learnt from: CR
PR: agentuity/docs#0
File: agent-docs/.cursor/rules/agent.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-23T12:40:22.412Z
Learning: Applies to agent-docs/**/src/agents/**/index.ts : The file should export a default function

Applied to files:

  • app/api/page-content/route.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Workers Builds: docs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/api/page-content/route.ts (2)

31-33: LGTM! Clean 404 handling.

The null check and 404 response are appropriate and maintain the expected API contract.


25-29: Unable to locate docs.json for ambiguity check

I ran a script to find and analyze the docs.json file but didn’t find it in the repository. Please:

  • Confirm the exact filename and path of your docs metadata (e.g. docs.json, content/docs.json, etc.).
  • Manually inspect that file for any cases where two entries collapse to the same base path (for example both foo.mdx and foo/index.mdx), which could lead to unpredictable matches.

Once you’ve located and reviewed it, you can ensure there are no overlapping base paths so that the three-pattern lookup remains unambiguous.

Comment on lines +2 to +10
import docsJson from '@/content/docs.json';

interface Doc {
file: string;
meta: Record<string, unknown>;
content: string;
}

const docs = docsJson.docs as Doc[];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add runtime validation for the imported JSON structure.

The type assertion as Doc[] bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which could lead to runtime errors if docs.json doesn't match the expected structure.

Consider adding runtime validation:

-const docs = docsJson.docs as Doc[];
+const docs = Array.isArray(docsJson.docs) 
+  ? (docsJson.docs as Doc[])
+  : [];
+
+// Validate the structure exists
+if (docs.length === 0) {
+  console.warn('No docs found in docs.json - Copy Page feature may not work');
+}

Additionally, consider making the meta property more specific if you know the expected fields:

interface Doc {
  file: string;
-  meta: Record<string, unknown>;
+  meta: {
+    title?: string;
+    description?: string;
+    [key: string]: unknown;
+  };
  content: string;
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import docsJson from '@/content/docs.json';
interface Doc {
file: string;
meta: Record<string, unknown>;
content: string;
}
const docs = docsJson.docs as Doc[];
import docsJson from '@/content/docs.json';
interface Doc {
file: string;
meta: {
title?: string;
description?: string;
[key: string]: unknown;
};
content: string;
}
const docs = Array.isArray(docsJson.docs)
? (docsJson.docs as Doc[])
: [];
// Validate the structure exists
if (docs.length === 0) {
console.warn('No docs found in docs.json - Copy Page feature may not work');
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In app/api/page-content/route.ts around lines 2 to 10, the imported JSON is cast
to Doc[] using a type assertion, which skips runtime validation and risks
runtime errors if the JSON structure is incorrect. To fix this, implement
runtime validation of the imported JSON data against the expected Doc interface,
for example by using a validation library or manual checks to confirm each
object has the required fields with correct types before assigning to docs.
Also, refine the meta property type from Record<string, unknown> to a more
specific interface if the expected fields are known, improving type safety.

@afterrburn afterrburn merged commit b12a1ad into main Aug 1, 2025
2 checks passed
@afterrburn afterrburn deleted the devin/1753972992-fix-copy-page-dropdown-404 branch August 1, 2025 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant