recently only quater image for a7r4 #9
Comments
|
I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are you using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using the latest version of |
|
exiftool:
old gentoo (2020) exiftool-12.01
new gentoo (February 2023) exiftool-12.61
" not writing extratag 258"
only on new gentoo only for version (2) of make_arq (this version which
displays in green: not
old version 2020 nor actual)
yes, up to date (I will now check again) - it is seen that version taken
about week ago displays "in green",
and version taken yesterday gives reasonably colours (but only "quarter")
…On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Alberto Griggio ***@***.***> wrote:
I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are you
using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
<tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using the
latest version of make_arq.py: are you sure you are up to date?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANX7Z5APYPHBGNI3E5LOSX3XHDC4BANCNFSM6AAAAAAYISWC5I>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
checked, up to date version of make_arq
as seen old-Screenshot_20230520_085145.png
version (2) of make_arq (version taken about week ago, with green patterns
on
new gentoo) on old gentoo displays only quarter (but right colours due to
tifffile)
…On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:49 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
exiftool:
old gentoo (2020) exiftool-12.01
new gentoo (February 2023) exiftool-12.61
" not writing extratag 258"
only on new gentoo only for version (2) of make_arq (this version which
displays in green: not
old version 2020 nor actual)
yes, up to date (I will now check again) - it is seen that version taken
about week ago displays "in green",
and version taken yesterday gives reasonably colours (but only "quarter")
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Alberto Griggio ***@***.***>
wrote:
> I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are you
> using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
>
> <tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
>
> if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using the
> latest version of make_arq.py: are you sure you are up to date?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#9 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANX7Z5APYPHBGNI3E5LOSX3XHDC4BANCNFSM6AAAAAAYISWC5I>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
|
I have temporarily changed exiftool to the outdated version 12.50 -
still only quarter
…On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:01 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
checked, up to date version of make_arq
as seen old-Screenshot_20230520_085145.png
version (2) of make_arq (version taken about week ago, with green patterns
on
new gentoo) on old gentoo displays only quarter (but right colours due to
tifffile)
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:49 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
> exiftool:
> old gentoo (2020) exiftool-12.01
> new gentoo (February 2023) exiftool-12.61
>
> " not writing extratag 258"
> only on new gentoo only for version (2) of make_arq (this version which
> displays in green: not
> old version 2020 nor actual)
>
> yes, up to date (I will now check again) - it is seen that version taken
> about week ago displays "in green",
> and version taken yesterday gives reasonably colours (but only "quarter")
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Alberto Griggio ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are you
>> using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
>>
>> <tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
>>
>> if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using
>> the latest version of make_arq.py: are you sure you are up to date?
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#9 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANX7Z5APYPHBGNI3E5LOSX3XHDC4BANCNFSM6AAAAAAYISWC5I>
>> .
>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>> ***@***.***>
>>
>
|
|
I have put line print(offset) in function get_sony_frame_data.
def get_sony_frame_data(data, frame, idx, factor):
filename, tags = frame
width = tags['EXIF:ImageWidth']
height = tags['EXIF:ImageHeight']
offset = tags['EXIF:StripOffsets']
print(offset)
rowstart = 1 if (idx // 4) >= 2 else 0
........
Are offsets correct?
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01004.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01003.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01006.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01005.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01000.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC00999.ARW
733184
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01002.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01001.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01012.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01011.ARW
720896
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01014.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01013.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01008.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01007.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01010.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01009.ARW
729088
…On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:19 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
I have temporarily changed exiftool to the outdated version 12.50 -
still only quarter
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:01 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
> checked, up to date version of make_arq
>
> as seen old-Screenshot_20230520_085145.png
> version (2) of make_arq (version taken about week ago, with green
> patterns on
> new gentoo) on old gentoo displays only quarter (but right colours due to
> tifffile)
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:49 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>> exiftool:
>> old gentoo (2020) exiftool-12.01
>> new gentoo (February 2023) exiftool-12.61
>>
>> " not writing extratag 258"
>> only on new gentoo only for version (2) of make_arq (this version which
>> displays in green: not
>> old version 2020 nor actual)
>>
>> yes, up to date (I will now check again) - it is seen that version taken
>> about week ago displays "in green",
>> and version taken yesterday gives reasonably colours (but only "quarter")
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Alberto Griggio <
>> ***@***.***> wrote:
>>
>>> I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are
>>> you using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
>>>
>>> <tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
>>>
>>> if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using
>>> the latest version of make_arq.py: are you sure you are up to date?
>>>
>>> —
>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>> <#9 (comment)>,
>>> or unsubscribe
>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANX7Z5APYPHBGNI3E5LOSX3XHDC4BANCNFSM6AAAAAAYISWC5I>
>>> .
>>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>>> ***@***.***>
>>>
>>
|
|
In this issue I have taken into account only
pure python make_arq.py (without python _makearq_setup.py build_ext
--inplace).
To see full image (not quarter) I had to apply
following patch:
diff make_arq-working.py make_arq.py
70a71
78c79
< if 0 <= rr < height * factor:
---
if 0 <= rr < height:
82c83
< if 0 <= cc < width*factor:
---
if 0 <= cc < width:
where make_arq.py is taken on May 20, 2023 from zip file.
I think that this issue has nothing in common with
exiftool (python, tifffile, etc) versions
and can be closed.
This program is really great.
…On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:00 AM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
I have put line print(offset) in function get_sony_frame_data.
def get_sony_frame_data(data, frame, idx, factor):
filename, tags = frame
width = tags['EXIF:ImageWidth']
height = tags['EXIF:ImageHeight']
offset = tags['EXIF:StripOffsets']
print(offset)
rowstart = 1 if (idx // 4) >= 2 else 0
........
Are offsets correct?
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01004.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01003.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01006.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01005.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01000.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC00999.ARW
733184
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01002.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01001.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01012.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01011.ARW
720896
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01014.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01013.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01008.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01007.ARW
729088
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01010.ARW
724992
Reading frame: /mnt/part12/pshift2/DSC01009.ARW
729088
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:19 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
> I have temporarily changed exiftool to the outdated version 12.50 -
> still only quarter
>
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:01 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>> checked, up to date version of make_arq
>>
>> as seen old-Screenshot_20230520_085145.png
>> version (2) of make_arq (version taken about week ago, with green
>> patterns on
>> new gentoo) on old gentoo displays only quarter (but right colours due
>> to tifffile)
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:49 PM jj1234 bb1234 ***@***.***>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> exiftool:
>>> old gentoo (2020) exiftool-12.01
>>> new gentoo (February 2023) exiftool-12.61
>>>
>>> " not writing extratag 258"
>>> only on new gentoo only for version (2) of make_arq (this version which
>>> displays in green: not
>>> old version 2020 nor actual)
>>>
>>> yes, up to date (I will now check again) - it is seen that version
>>> taken about week ago displays "in green",
>>> and version taken yesterday gives reasonably colours (but only
>>> "quarter")
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Alberto Griggio <
>>> ***@***.***> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I tried and everything works fine here. What version of exiftool are
>>>> you using? Also, this line looks suspicious:
>>>>
>>>> <tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
>>>>
>>>> if you are getting that in the console, most likely you are not using
>>>> the latest version of make_arq.py: are you sure you are up to date?
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>> <#9 (comment)>,
>>>> or unsubscribe
>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANX7Z5APYPHBGNI3E5LOSX3XHDC4BANCNFSM6AAAAAAYISWC5I>
>>>> .
>>>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>>>> ***@***.***>
>>>>
>>>
|
|
Hi, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have tested three versions of make_arq:
on two (old and new) gentoo distributions.
old (2020):
python-3.7.8-r2
tifffile 2020.11.18
glibc-2.31-r6
new (2023):
python-3.9.16_p3 (can be switched to version python-3.10.11)
tifffile 2023.4.12
glibc-2.37-r2
<tifffile.TiffWriter 'out16-new-2.ARQ'> not writing extratag 258
Recent version of make_arq displays only quater image.
Only oldest make_arg on old gentoo displays full image.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iJwx1Mh-BLHi6RoFdn1Q7TyYzvOn1KgA/view?usp=sharing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: