Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: reference new Accidental class instead of enum #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2023
Merged

docs: reference new Accidental class instead of enum #9

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2023

Conversation

albertms10
Copy link
Owner

Continues #8

@albertms10 albertms10 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 self-assigned this Apr 5, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 added refactor The code needs to be refactored and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 5, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4623793290

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 48.338%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4623745156: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 160
Relevant Lines: 331
💛 - Coveralls

@albertms10 albertms10 merged commit 149187d into main Apr 5, 2023
@albertms10 albertms10 deleted the docs/fix-accidentals-enum-references branch April 5, 2023 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@albertms10 albertms10

Labels
refactor The code needs to be refactored
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@albertms10 @coveralls