-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Contributors with tags, randomized #6985
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchQueries.graphql (1)
7-9
: LGTM! Consider adding a default value for $withTags.The addition of the
$withTags
parameter to filter users based on tags is well-implemented and follows GraphQL best practices. It's correctly added to both the query signature and theusersPaginated
field.To improve backwards compatibility and ease of use, consider adding a default value for the
$withTags
parameter in the query signature. This would ensure that existing clients don't break if they don't provide this new parameter.You could update the query signature like this:
query ContributorsPageUsers($first: Int!, $after: UUID, $filter: UserFilterInput, $withTags: Boolean = false) { usersPaginated(first: $first, after: $after, filter: $filter, withTags: $withTags) { ...UserContributorPaginated } }This change would make the
$withTags
parameter optional with a default value offalse
, maintaining the current behavior for existing clients.src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (1)
71-83
: LGTM: Efficient implementation of randomized users.The use of
useMemo
and the logic to shuffle only the new portion of the array are excellent optimizations. This approach prevents unnecessary re-renders and improves performance.One minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider extracting the
pageSize
fromusersQueryResult
to avoid potential inconsistencies:- const randomizedNewUsers = arrayShuffle(users.slice(-pageSize)); + const newUsersCount = users.length - usersQueryResult.data?.usersPaginated.users?.length || 0; + const randomizedNewUsers = arrayShuffle(users.slice(-newUsersCount)); - return [...users.slice(0, users.length - pageSize), ...randomizedNewUsers]; + return [...users.slice(0, users.length - newUsersCount), ...randomizedNewUsers];This change ensures that the number of new users shuffled always matches the actual number of new users added, regardless of the current
pageSize
.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/core/utils/array.shuffle.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchQueries.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/ContributorsView.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/core/utils/array.shuffle.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchQueries.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/community/user/ContributorsView.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (4)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updated.The addition of
useMemo
andarrayShuffle
imports are consistent with their usage in the component and follow good code organization practices.Also applies to: 19-19
86-86
: LGTM: Correctly using randomized users.The
items
property now correctly references therandomizedUsers
array, ensuring that the shuffled user list is used in the component's output. This change is consistent with the newrandomizedUsers
implementation.
Line range hint
94-94
: Fix typo in variable name.There's a typo in the variable name
oragnizationsQueryResult
. This should be corrected toorganizationsQueryResult
to maintain consistency and prevent potential bugs.Apply this change:
- const oragnizationsQueryResult = usePaginatedQuery< + const organizationsQueryResult = usePaginatedQuery<Also, please ensure that this variable name is used consistently throughout the file and any other files where it might be referenced.
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of oragnizationsQueryResult in the codebase rg --type typescript 'oragnizationsQueryResult'
64-64
: Clarify the purpose ofwithTags
.A new variable
withTags: false
has been added to the query variables. Could you please explain the intended use of this parameter? It's currently set tofalse
, but it's not clear how or when it would be used.✅ Verification successful
withTags
is correctly implemented and utilized in the relevant GraphQL queries.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of withTags in GraphQL queries ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'query $_($$_) { $$$ withTags: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of withTags in GraphQL queries within TypeScript files ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'query $_($$_) { $$$ withTags: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 552
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of withTags in TypeScript files within the src directory rg --type typescript 'withTags' src/Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of withTags in TypeScript files within the src directory rg 'withTags' --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" src/Length of output: 695
src/domain/community/user/ContributorsView.tsx (1)
27-27
: Consider performance implications of increasing ITEMS_PER_PAGEThe change from 16 to 32 items per page could have both positive and negative effects:
Pros:
- More items displayed at once, reducing pagination needs.
- Potentially fewer API calls if data is fetched in batches.
Cons:
- Increased initial load time and memory usage.
- Potentially slower rendering, especially on lower-end devices.
- May affect user experience if the layout becomes crowded.
To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact performance or user experience, consider the following:
- Verify that the API and frontend can handle the increased load efficiently.
- Test the component's rendering performance, especially on lower-end devices.
- Conduct user testing to ensure the increased number of items doesn't overwhelm users.
Consider implementing virtualization (e.g., react-window or react-virtualized) if not already in use. This can help maintain performance with larger lists by only rendering visible items.
✅ Verification successful
ITEMS_PER_PAGE increase verified
No performance-related comments, TODOs, or performance tests were found in the codebase. The change from 16 to 32 items per page does not introduce any known performance issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any performance-related comments or TODOs rg --type typescript "TODO.*performance|FIXME.*performance" src/ # Look for any existing performance tests rg --type typescript "test.*performance|benchmark" src/Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any performance-related comments or TODOs in TypeScript and TSX files rg "TODO.*performance|FIXME.*performance" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" src/ # Look for any existing performance tests or benchmarks in TypeScript and TSX files rg "test.*performance|benchmark" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" src/Length of output: 146
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (2)
64-64
: LGTM: withTags added to query variablesThe addition of
withTags: true
aligns with the PR objective of including tags for contributors. This change is correct and necessary for the new functionality.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
withTags
for better code readability and maintainability.
71-83
: LGTM: Efficient implementation of randomizedUsersThe use of
useMemo
forrandomizedUsers
is an excellent optimization. The logic to shuffle only the new portion of the array is a smart approach to minimize re-renders.Consider adding a console.warn or a custom error logging mechanism when
users
is undefined, to help with debugging in development:if (!users) { console.warn('Users data is undefined in randomizedUsers calculation'); return []; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/community/contributor/ContributorsSearch/ContributorsSearchContainer.tsx (2)
1-1
: LGTM: Appropriate imports addedThe addition of
useMemo
from React andarrayShuffle
from the utility file are correct and necessary for the new functionality implemented in this component.Also applies to: 19-19
86-86
: LGTM: Correctly applying randomizedUsersThe change to use
randomizedUsers
for theitems
property in theusers
object is correct and consistent with the new randomization logic implemented earlier.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code looks good and the implementation works.
Note that with the current server/API implementation you can't see users without tags (even using the search). This could be misleading but not related to this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/domain/community/user/ContributorsPage.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/user/ContributorsPage.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements