Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove guardrails docstring from Auto(*) #208

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019
Merged

Conversation

angela97lin
Copy link
Contributor

Removing guardrails from Auto(*) docstrings

@angela97lin angela97lin changed the title Remove guardrails Remove guardrails docstring from Auto(*) Nov 13, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #208 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #208   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.77%   96.77%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines        2354     2354           
=======================================
  Hits         2278     2278           
  Misses         76       76
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
evalml/models/auto_regressor.py 90.9% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
evalml/models/auto_classifier.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 80353d0...51195b1. Read the comment docs.

@angela97lin angela97lin merged commit 91e07ab into master Nov 13, 2019
@angela97lin angela97lin self-assigned this Nov 13, 2019
@angela97lin angela97lin mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2019
@angela97lin angela97lin deleted the remove_guardrails branch April 17, 2020 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants