-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extends pool to gamlss objects #406
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. That seems like a simple solution.
- Are you implying that
tidy
forgamlss
objects actually do store all parameters? - Are you aware of any problems this change may create? Did all tests run?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See also #405
Yes, broom::tidy stores all parameters. It should not create any issues because it will not change the variable I ran the tests below.
|
Ok, thanks.
|
Closes #405