ASCII art is simply not precise enough
- The New York Times
The Braille character set in unicode provides more granularity over full-character ascii art by decomposing a full character into a 2 by 4 set of dots, resulting in twice (quadruple) the horizontal (vertical) precision.
Right now, there are two features
- time series/bar plotting: a list like [1,2,3,4,5] gets plotted sequentially
- histogramming: a list like [1,2,3,4,5] gets turned into a frequency histogram, in the true sense of "histogram" (not just drawing bars on a regular x-y plot and calling it a histogram)
It's a single file.
(Note that if you're using the histogram functionality, you need to have numpy installed.)
N.B.: Characters seem to get shifted on asciinema, but they look perfect in a few terminals that I've tried. Trust me.
Try python braille.py --example_hist or python braille.py --example_timeseries to see some examples.
You can also pipe data via
seq 1 100 | ./braille.py
to get a sequential bar graph, or
# central limit theorem: add 3 flat random numbers to get a pretty gaussian distribution
# -f forces the script to make a frequency histogram, rather than a time series by default
for i in `seq 1 10000`; do echo $((RANDOM + RANDOM + RANDOM)); done | ./braille.py -fto get a gaussian histogram.
Or for full control in python,
import random
import braille
# make a histogram with two flat peaks
# binning is automatic unless nbins is specified
vals = [random.random()-1.5 for _ in range(500)]
vals += [random.random()+1.5 for _ in range(500)]
painter = braille.Painter()
painter.draw(braille.make_hist(vals, nbins=25))