Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2024. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2024. It is now read-only.

ShadowDOM support request #4367

@firstor

Description

@firstor

Seems that ShadowDOM support is still missing:

Background

I am working with some Polymer 2 components which implements ShadowDOM v1 spec and I need to select elements inside their shadowRoots to run e2e tests. deepCss might be a solution but it doesn't work for me. As far as I can see, by.deepCss is nothing special difference with by.css but appending * /deep/ at the beginning of the given CSS selector, however, /deep/ seems deprecated on the browser.

I am working with the following versions:

  • Node Version: v6.10.3
  • Protractor Version: v5.1.2
  • Angular Version: v4.2.4
  • Browser(s): Chrome
  • Operating System and Version: Ubuntu v16.04.2 AMD64 LTS Xenial

I think I checked all relevant articles including the followings and I couldn't get any satisfied answer:

Workaround

Anyway, I can select inner elements of ShadowDOM elements by adding a custom locator. Here is my workaround:

/**
 * Usage:
 *   O  element(by.css_sr('#parentElement #innerElement'))          <=> $('#parentElement #innerElement')
 *   O  element(by.css_sr('#parentElement::sr #innerElement'))      <=> $('#parentElement').shadowRoot.$('#innerElement')
 *   O  element.all(by.css_sr('#parentElement .inner-element'))     <=> $$('#parentElement .inner-element')
 *   O  element.all(by.css_sr('#parentElement::sr .inner-element')) <=> $$('#parentElement').shadowRoot.$$('.inner-element')
 *   O  parentElement.element(by.css_sr('#innerElement'))           <=> parentElement.$('#innerElement')
 *   O  parentElement.element(by.css_sr('::sr #innerElement'))      <=> parentElement.shadowRoot.$('#innerElement')
 *   O  parentElement.all(by.css_sr('.inner-element'))              <=> parentElement.$$('.inner-element')
 *   O  parentElement.all(by.css_sr('::sr .inner-element'))         <=> parentElement.shadowRoot.$$('.inner-element')
 */
by.addLocator('css_sr', (cssSelector: string, opt_parentElement, opt_rootSelector) => {
    let selectors = cssSelector.split('::sr');
    if (selectors.length === 0) {
        return [];
    }

    let shadowDomInUse = (document.head.createShadowRoot || document.head.attachShadow);
    let getShadowRoot  = (el) => ((el && shadowDomInUse) ? el.shadowRoot : el);
    let findAllMatches = (selector: string, targets: any[], firstTry: boolean) => {
        let using, i, matches = [];
        for (i = 0; i < targets.length; ++i) {
            using = (firstTry) ? targets[i] : getShadowRoot(targets[i]);
            if (using) {
                if (selector === '') {
                    matches.push(using);
                } else {
                    Array.prototype.push.apply(matches, using.querySelectorAll(selector));
                }
            }
        }
        return matches;
    };

    let matches = findAllMatches(selectors.shift().trim(), [opt_parentElement || document], true);
    while (selectors.length > 0 && matches.length > 0) {
        matches = findAllMatches(selectors.shift().trim(), matches, false);
    }
    return matches;
});

Conclusion

Since the workaround works on my side, so I am asking~ is there anything I missed or I misused the background principle of Protractor in my workaround? I am politely saying ... if I don't violate your certain rules too much, is it possible to add ShadowDOM support something like that into the next update of Protractor?

Thank you.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions