This repository has been archived by the owner on May 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
Bot should post a useful comment once it detects a PR with missing repo/branch #1018
Labels
Comments
N.B. It was suggested by @jctanner in Slack that it should also be closed. But I still insist on posting a message along with that. |
Yep, the closure message can indicate why it was closed. |
@gundalow thoughts? |
+1 to closing with message |
webknjaz
added a commit
to webknjaz/ansibullbot
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2018
webknjaz
added a commit
to webknjaz/ansibullbot
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2018
webknjaz
added a commit
to webknjaz/ansibullbot
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2018
gundalow
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2018
* Refactor incoming repo access properties * Advise users how to proceed with lost PR branch Fixes #1018 * Fix typo in "with" word in comment template * Wrap `git push` command as a code block * Improve wording in the comment's second paragraph * Refactor template vars generation * Ensure that PR creation link is urlencoded
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I expect that i'd post somethig like ansible/ansible#40411 (comment) if check like #1017 met.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: