FIx formatting of Dataset inlet/outlet note in TaskFlow concepts

[josh-fell]

Before

After

[vemikhaylov]

Can it make sense to replace all (or almost all) such "Note: " places in ".rst" with the corresponding formatting?

For instance,

https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-google/stable/operators/cloud/video_intelligence.html

https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-google/operators/cloud/video_intelligence.rst#more-information

[josh-fell]

Can it make sense to replace all (or almost all) such "Note: " places in ".rst" with the corresponding formatting?

For instance,

https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-google/stable/operators/cloud/video_intelligence.html

https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-google/operators/cloud/video_intelligence.rst#more-information

@vemikhaylov Maybe? This was fixing readability and it looked like the rST had a directive started but never finished (i.e. just a hanging ..); however, if you feel there are improvements to be made to the docs, PRs are absolutely welcome! If that includes converting these explicit notes to a formatted one, I'd say go for it.

[vemikhaylov]

it looked like the rST had a directive started but never finished (i.e. just a hanging ..);

I'm definitely not an RST expert, but I think just a single :: quotes the paragraph below exactly as it was seen on your screenshot in the PR description. On wiki they call it "blockquoting" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReStructuredText). You can search in the repo (^::\n), it's used in several places, somewhere probably it's justified.

however, if you feel there are improvements to be made to the docs, PRs are absolutely welcome! If that includes converting these explicit notes to a formatted one, I'd say go for it.

Sure thing, I'll create a PR to move to the explicit RST note usage where it makes sense. Thanks!