Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AzureBatchOperator example #33716

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 25, 2023

Conversation

Lee-W
Copy link
Member

@Lee-W Lee-W commented Aug 25, 2023

圖片


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@phanikumv phanikumv merged commit 0931abd into apache:main Aug 25, 2023
42 checks passed
@phanikumv phanikumv deleted the add-AzureBatchOperator-example branch August 25, 2023 08:06
potiuk added a commit to potiuk/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
The Hook instantiation for Azure Batch has been done in the
constructor, which is wrong. This has been detected when apache#33716 added
example dag and it started to fail provider imports as connection
has beeen missing to instantiate it.

The hook instantiation is now moved to cached property.
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
The Hook instantiation for Azure Batch has been done in the
constructor, which is wrong. This has been detected when #33716 added
example dag and it started to fail provider imports as connection
has beeen missing to instantiate it.

The hook instantiation is now moved to cached property.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants