[openlineage] fix: Prevent error when extractor can't be imported #39736
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Kacper Muda <mudakacper@gmail.com>
kacpermuda
force-pushed
the
fix-extractors
branch
from
735adcd
to
4d6c095
Compare
mobuchowski
approved these changes
May 21, 2024
romsharon98
pushed a commit
to romsharon98/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Kacper Muda <mudakacper@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When extractor can't be imported, an error will be raised when trying to call
extractor.get_operator_classnames(). This PR fixes that and elevates the logging level so that the user is aware of the problem even without debugging logs.Also moved
try_import_from_string()to utils, so it's easier to use in other processes, like in #38982^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.