Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BEAM-5878] support DoFns with Keyword-only arguments #9237
[BEAM-5878] support DoFns with Keyword-only arguments #9237
Changes from 1 commit
0e5bd93
d7e1212
7721417
fef7199
5d7de9f
0cb0be0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use a more generic signature of new_save_reduce, for example
def new_save_reduce(self, func, args, **kwargs)
? The problem is that we assume a particular version of the API for pickle.save_reduce here, and we can see that it will change in Python 3.8, see https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/c75f0e5bdee3cfaba9fd5b3a8549dec0aba01ebe/Lib/pickle.py#L619.I think with a generic definition of
new_save_reduce
we can still updateargs
list , and pass**kwargs
topickler.save_reduce
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Quite so. I'll work on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, @lazylynx . It would be nice to add this to next Beam release that is not be cut in ~2 weeks. Thanks for your help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tvalentyn Sorry for late. PTAL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, and thanks a lot, @lazylynx ! The change looks good to me. I'm going to re-run a few tests to make sure that they still pass with this change combined with a recent upgrade of dill version (#9419).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would not this call back into
new_save_reduce
since you patched it in L164?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This call back calls
save_reduce
function ofpickle.Pickler
, super class ofdill.dill.Pickler
.So
new_save_reduce
would not be called.