Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Hi @yanboer, From the code, yes, they are really implemented and not just accepted by the parser. In Limitations I found in the same file:
One more thing since your build has assert checking: 867c6a1 on main ("Fix assert failure triggered by CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY", #1845) fixes an assertion failure in CIC when resource groups are enabled. Worth checking if your version has it before relying on CIC. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
I checked the documentation for the following statements:
CREATE INDEX: https://cloudberry.apache.org/docs/sql-stmts/create-indexDROP INDEX: https://cloudberry.apache.org/docs/sql-stmts/drop-indexREINDEX: https://cloudberry.apache.org/docs/sql-stmts/reindexAccording to the docs, only
DROP INDEXmentions support forCONCURRENTLY.However, in Apache Cloudberry 2.0.0-incubating, all three statements appear to accept the
CONCURRENTLYsyntax:Could you please clarify:
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLYandREINDEX ... CONCURRENTLYofficially supported in 2.0.0?WHEREpredicate), or invalid indexes left behind after a failed concurrent build?Thanks.
All reactions