-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
CLOUDSTACK-4045 IP address acquired with associateIpAddress is marked as source NAT #2382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
houthuis
wants to merge
9
commits into
apache:master
from
houthuis:CLOUDSTACK-4045-IP-address-acquired-with-associateIpAddress-is-marked-as-source-NAT
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
914018c
CLOUDSTACK-4045 added a check for network state when determining whet…
108436f
CLOUDSTACK-4045 added unit tests
44e300e
CLOUDSTACK-4045 cleanup, refactor
a886750
CLOUDSTACK-4045 cleanup, refactor
52a8501
CLOUDSTACK-4045 test_network fix
3e97920
CLOUDSTACK-4045 test_portforwardingrules fix
f727d94
CLOUDSTACK-4045 get_template -> get_test_template
3990e76
CLOUDSTACK-4045 test_portforwardingrules fix
580ad16
changed getSharedSourceNat to isSharedSourceNat to match master
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make it perfect a Java documentation describing when an IP is considered source NAT would be welcome.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rafaelweingartner , wouldn't that just be describing the code in this protected method? I'd rather see the code be more prozaic so i can just read that (if need be)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, for me, the java doc should present the idea of the method, and not just describe the code. The code is the implementation of the idea. By idea here I mean, the context where the given method fits in, the behavior we intend it to have (from an input/output perspective), but not describing the implementation at a line by line perspective.