-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
smoke test: fixes test_vm_deployment_planner #7718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@blueorangutan package |
@weizhouapache a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6427 |
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-67u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-67u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7053)
|
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6468 |
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-67u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7100)
|
@shwstppr @weizhouapache can you review? |
@shwstppr @weizhouapache , is this explanation enough? |
34c3ad3
to
9c4495e
Compare
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
@DaanHoogland with this PR, the test will get the template with random (?) hypervisor, right ? |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6606 |
you can call it random, but in an env with only one hypervisor it will get the template registered instead of trying to force to get the kvm template. this is why the tests would fail on vmware. |
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
ok, let's run some tests on vmware |
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
@weizhouapache a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
@blueorangutan test ubuntu22 vmware-70u3 |
@blueorangutan test ubuntu22 vmware-70u3 |
@weizhouapache a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ubuntu22 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7217)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7216)
|
@blueorangutan test rocky8 vmware-67u3 |
@weizhouapache a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + vmware-67u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7234)
|
@blueorangutan test ubuntu22 vmware-70u3 |
@weizhouapache a [SF] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ubuntu22 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM haven't tested it
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-7242)
|
Description
This PR...
This doesn't fix #7717 , but removes the abundant requirement from test_vm_deployment_planner, which looks for a specific template using the wrong hypervisor. The described issue in #7717 remains that the testclient doesn't have the right type of hypervisor configured.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?