Skip to content

[improvement](column_reader) move load once to index reader to reduce #23537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor

memory footprint of column reader

Proposed changes

Issue Number: close #xxx

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 46.7 seconds
stream load tsv: 535 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 133 MB/s
stream load json: 21 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 107 MB/s
stream load orc: 64 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 31 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 26 MB/s
insert into select: 29.0 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 344K ops/s
storage size: 17162363108 Bytes

@dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 49.1 seconds
stream load tsv: 552 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 129 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 64 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 31 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 26 MB/s
insert into select: 29.2 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 342K ops/s
storage size: 17161984417 Bytes

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 45.77 seconds
stream load tsv: 548 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 130 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 64 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 30 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 27 MB/s
insert into select: 28.8 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 347K ops/s
storage size: 17162047820 Bytes

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 45.88 seconds
stream load tsv: 538 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 132 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 64 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 31 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 26 MB/s
insert into select: 28.7 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 348K ops/s
storage size: 17162333081 Bytes

Copy link
Contributor

@xinyiZzz xinyiZzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@sollhui sollhui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@xinyiZzz xinyiZzz merged commit 9c65b7a into apache:master Aug 29, 2023
xiaokang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.0.2-merged reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants