Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-14316] Properly manage rpcConnection in JobManagerLeaderListener under leader change #11603

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

This commit changes how the rpcConnection is managed in JobManagerLeaderListener under leader change.
This component clears now the fields rpcConnection and currentJobMasterId if the leader loses leadership.
Moreover, it only restarts a connection attempt if the leader session id is new.

Verifying this change

  • Added JobLeaderServiceTest.canReconnectToOldLeaderWithSameLeaderAddress

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

…er under leader change

This commit changes how the rpcConnection is managed in JobManagerLeaderListener under leader change.
This component clears now the fields rpcConnection and currentJobMasterId if the leader loses leadership.
Moreover, it only restarts a connection attempt if the leader session id is new.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 1, 2020

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 34d7bb3 (Wed Apr 15 11:39:24 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 1, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@zentol zentol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small comment on logging, otherwise this looks good.

Would have preferred if the refactoring to doesNotReconnectAfterTargetLostLeadership were done in a separate commit though.

}
// check whether we are already connecting to this leader
if (Objects.equals(jobMasterId, currentJobMasterId)) {
LOG.debug("Trying already connecting to leader of job {}. Ignoring duplicate leader information.", jobId);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reads a bit weird? How about "Ongoing attempt to connect to leader of job{}. ..."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Will update it.

@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @zentol. I've addressed your comment. Merging this PR now. The failing test case seems to be unrelated (blink planner).

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann deleted the FLINK-14316 branch April 2, 2020 16:16
KarmaGYZ pushed a commit to KarmaGYZ/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2020
…er under leader change

This commit changes how the rpcConnection is managed in JobManagerLeaderListener under leader change.
This component clears now the fields rpcConnection and currentJobMasterId if the leader loses leadership.
Moreover, it only restarts a connection attempt if the leader session id is new.

This closes apache#11603.
leonardBang pushed a commit to leonardBang/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2020
…er under leader change

This commit changes how the rpcConnection is managed in JobManagerLeaderListener under leader change.
This component clears now the fields rpcConnection and currentJobMasterId if the leader loses leadership.
Moreover, it only restarts a connection attempt if the leader session id is new.

This closes apache#11603.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants