-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
[FLINK-22067][tests] Wait for vertices to start using API #15858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community Automated ChecksLast check on commit 1532861 (Sat Aug 28 12:09:12 UTC 2021) Warnings:
Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. Review Progress
Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process. The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commandsThe @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
|
|
||
public <T extends WaitingFunction> String takeSavepoint( | ||
T waitingFunction, Function<T, StreamExecutionEnvironment> jobGraphFactory) { | ||
T waitingFunction /*todo: inline and delete class?*/, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it can be safely inlined then +1. The more we can simplify the better.
} | ||
|
||
private void waitForAllRunningOrSomeTerminal(JobID jobID) throws Exception { | ||
while (true) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this have some sort of timeout? Or are we happy to let the CI kill the process after some time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better to rely on CI timeout (this topic was recently discussed here).
Thanks for reviewing @sjwiesman. edit: |
…tApplyEvictorWindowStateReader
What is the purpose of the change
Showcase the usage of API instead of latches to wait for vertices to start.
This should prevent bugs when not all tasks are running at the time of taking a savepoint.