-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HBASE-28408 Rephrase confusing log message #5718
HBASE-28408 Rephrase confusing log message #5718
Conversation
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
hbase-backup/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/backup/impl/RestoreTablesClient.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Will merge this later today. |
Hi @DieterDP-ng thanks for the PR. I have merged this PR. But going forward, please raise PRs targeted at master first. We merge PRs in master and then backport to older branches. Let me try to forward port this change to newer branching. Will let you know if any help is needed. |
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process. Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <nihaljain@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process. Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <nihaljain@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3. When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process. Signed-off-by: Nihal Jain <nihaljain@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 102c1b6)
Thanks @NihalJain, I'll do so in the future. |
Assume a user has a series of backups: Full1, Inc2, Inc3, where a table has not changed between Full1 and Inc3, but has changed after Inc3.
When restoring that table to Inc3, a log warning was outputted mentioning there was no need for a restore. This message in fact means there is no need for the incremental restore portion of the restore process.