Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency org.bitbucket.b_c:jose4j to v0.9.3 #1416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2023

Conversation

solrbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@solrbot solrbot commented Mar 1, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
org.bitbucket.b_c:jose4j (source) dependencies minor 0.7.9 -> 0.9.3

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* * * * *" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot

@risdenk risdenk requested a review from janhoy March 2, 2023 13:39
@risdenk
Copy link
Contributor

risdenk commented Mar 2, 2023

@janhoy you probably want to look closer at this one. jose4j has been a rough upgrade from what I remember in the past from other projects. At least make sure this doesn't subtly break jwt-auth.

Copy link
Contributor

@janhoy janhoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I read the release notes and could not see anything breaking.

@janhoy janhoy merged commit 6f81d55 into apache:main Mar 2, 2023
janhoy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
@solrbot solrbot deleted the renovate/org.bitbucket.b_c-jose4j-0.x branch March 2, 2023 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants