Skip to content

[MLLib] Fix example code variable name misspelling in MLLib Feature Extraction guide #2459

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[MLLib] Fix example code variable name misspelling in MLLib Feature Extraction guide #2459

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rnowling
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 19, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2459 at commit b370a91.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 19, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2459 at commit b370a91.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable
    • class SparseMatrix(
    • sealed trait Vector extends Serializable

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Sep 22, 2014

LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.1. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in fec9215 Sep 22, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2014
@rnowling @mengxr
[MLLib] Fix example code variable name misspelling in MLLib Feature E…
32bb97f 
…xtraction guide

Author: RJ Nowling <rnowling@gmail.com>

Closes #2459 from rnowling/tfidf-fix and squashes the following commits:

b370a91 [RJ Nowling] Fix variable name misspelling in MLLib Feature Extraction guide

(cherry picked from commit fec9215)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
@rnowling rnowling deleted the tfidf-fix branch September 22, 2014 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@rnowling @SparkQA @mengxr