[SPARK-51165][CORE] Enable spark.master.rest.enabled by default
#49894
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
force-pushed
the
SPARK-51165
branch
from
40a0be3 to
cf4a6eb
Compare
|
Could you review this PR, @LuciferYang ? |
LuciferYang
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
|
Thank you so much, @LuciferYang ! Merged to master for Apache Spark 4.1.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to enable
spark.master.rest.enabledby default for Apache Spark 4.1.0.Why are the changes needed?
Apache Spark is ready to enable this feature by default.
spark.master.rest.enabledhas been used stably.spark.master.rest.filtersprovides a way to serve it securely.spark.master.rest.filters#47595Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the migration guide is updated.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.