[SPARK-53258][CORE][SQL] Use JavaUtils's check(Argument|State)
#51988
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
changed the title
JavaUtils's check(Argument|NotNull|State)JavaUtils's check(Argument|State)
dongjoon-hyun
force-pushed
the
SPARK-53258
branch
from
071319b to
f0e3f3f
Compare
|
I realized that I completed forgot about your previous clean-up contribution (#51926), @LuciferYang . Sorry about that. |
LuciferYang
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
yaooqinn
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
peter-toth
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
|
Thank you, @LuciferYang , @yaooqinn , and @peter-toth ! Merged to master for Apache Spark 4.1.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to use
checkArgumentandcheckStateofJavaUtilsclass instead ofcom.google.common.base.PreconditionsWhy are the changes needed?
To use Apache Spark's existing code instead of 3rd party library.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.