[SPARK-9415][SQL] Throw AnalysisException when using MapType on Join and Aggregate #7819
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| case _ => // OK | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| aggregateExprs.foreach(checkValidAggregateExpression) | ||
| aggregateExprs.foreach(checkValidGroupingExprs) | ||
| groupingExprs.foreach(checkValidGroupingExprs) |
|
Test build #39180 has finished for PR 7819 at commit
|
|
Test build #39215 has finished for PR 7819 at commit
|
|
Thanks - I've merged this. |
cloud-fan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`hash()` and `xxhash64()` cannot be used on elements of `Maptype`. A new configuration `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is introduced to allow users to restore the previous behaviour.
When `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to false:
```
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())");
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'hash(map())' due to data type mismatch: input to function hash cannot contain elements of MapType; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(hash(map(), 42), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
when `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to true :
```
scala> spark.sql("set spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType=true");
res3: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, value: string]
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())").first()
res4: org.apache.spark.sql.Row = [42]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
As discussed in Jira, SparkSql's map hashcodes depends on their order of insertion which is not consistent with the normal scala behaviour which might confuse users.
Code snippet from JIRA :
```
val a = spark.createDataset(Map(1->1, 2->2) :: Nil)
val b = spark.createDataset(Map(2->2, 1->1) :: Nil)
// Demonstration of how Scala Map equality is unaffected by insertion order:
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2).hashCode() == Map(2->2, 1->1).hashCode())
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2) == Map(2->2, 1->1))
assert(a.first() == b.first())
// In contrast, this will print two different hashcodes:
println(Seq(a, b).map(_.selectExpr("hash(*)").first()))
```
Also `MapType` is prohibited for aggregation / joins / equality comparisons #7819 and set operations #17236.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now users cannot use hash functions on elements of `mapType`. To restore the previous behaviour set `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` to true.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added.
Closes #27580 from iRakson/SPARK-27619.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
tallamjr
pushed a commit
to tallamjr/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`hash()` and `xxhash64()` cannot be used on elements of `Maptype`. A new configuration `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is introduced to allow users to restore the previous behaviour.
When `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to false:
```
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())");
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'hash(map())' due to data type mismatch: input to function hash cannot contain elements of MapType; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(hash(map(), 42), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
when `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to true :
```
scala> spark.sql("set spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType=true");
res3: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, value: string]
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())").first()
res4: org.apache.spark.sql.Row = [42]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
As discussed in Jira, SparkSql's map hashcodes depends on their order of insertion which is not consistent with the normal scala behaviour which might confuse users.
Code snippet from JIRA :
```
val a = spark.createDataset(Map(1->1, 2->2) :: Nil)
val b = spark.createDataset(Map(2->2, 1->1) :: Nil)
// Demonstration of how Scala Map equality is unaffected by insertion order:
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2).hashCode() == Map(2->2, 1->1).hashCode())
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2) == Map(2->2, 1->1))
assert(a.first() == b.first())
// In contrast, this will print two different hashcodes:
println(Seq(a, b).map(_.selectExpr("hash(*)").first()))
```
Also `MapType` is prohibited for aggregation / joins / equality comparisons apache#7819 and set operations apache#17236.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now users cannot use hash functions on elements of `mapType`. To restore the previous behaviour set `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` to true.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added.
Closes apache#27580 from iRakson/SPARK-27619.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit c913b9d)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
sjincho
pushed a commit
to sjincho/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`hash()` and `xxhash64()` cannot be used on elements of `Maptype`. A new configuration `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is introduced to allow users to restore the previous behaviour.
When `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to false:
```
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())");
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'hash(map())' due to data type mismatch: input to function hash cannot contain elements of MapType; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(hash(map(), 42), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
when `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to true :
```
scala> spark.sql("set spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType=true");
res3: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, value: string]
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())").first()
res4: org.apache.spark.sql.Row = [42]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
As discussed in Jira, SparkSql's map hashcodes depends on their order of insertion which is not consistent with the normal scala behaviour which might confuse users.
Code snippet from JIRA :
```
val a = spark.createDataset(Map(1->1, 2->2) :: Nil)
val b = spark.createDataset(Map(2->2, 1->1) :: Nil)
// Demonstration of how Scala Map equality is unaffected by insertion order:
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2).hashCode() == Map(2->2, 1->1).hashCode())
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2) == Map(2->2, 1->1))
assert(a.first() == b.first())
// In contrast, this will print two different hashcodes:
println(Seq(a, b).map(_.selectExpr("hash(*)").first()))
```
Also `MapType` is prohibited for aggregation / joins / equality comparisons apache#7819 and set operations apache#17236.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now users cannot use hash functions on elements of `mapType`. To restore the previous behaviour set `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` to true.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added.
Closes apache#27580 from iRakson/SPARK-27619.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9415
Following up #7787. We shouldn't use MapType as grouping keys and join keys too.