Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cups-2.2.10/ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx:202]: (error) Using pointer to local variable 'bckname' that is out of scope. #5455

Closed
dcb314 opened this issue Dec 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

cups-2.2.10/ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx:202]: (error) Using pointer to local variable 'bckname' that is out of scope. #5455

dcb314 opened this issue Dec 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@michaelrsweet
Labels
priority-medium
Milestone
CUPS 2.2.x Updates

Comments

@dcb314
Copy link

dcb314 commented Dec 10, 2018

cups-2.2.10/ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx:157] -> [cups-2.2.10/ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx:144] -> [cups-2.2.10/ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx:202]: (error) Using pointer to local variable 'bckname' that is out of scope.

$ fgrep bckname ppdc/ppdmerge.cxx
char bckname[1024]; // Backup filename
snprintf(bckname, sizeof(bckname), "%s.bck", inname);
if (rename(inname, bckname))
inname, bckname, strerror(errno));
inname = bckname;
$
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet self-assigned this Dec 10, 2018
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added this to the CUPS 2.2.x Updates milestone Dec 10, 2018
michaelrsweet added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2018
@michaelrsweet
Fix ppdmerge backup filename (Issue #5455)
70bdce1
@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator

[master 70bdce1] Fix ppdmerge backup filename (Issue #5455)

[branch-2.2 f7d4cac] Fix ppdmerge backup filename (Issue #5455)

michaelrsweet added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2018
@michaelrsweet
Fix ppdmerge backup filename (Issue #5455)
f7d4cac
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet

Labels
priority-medium
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CUPS 2.2.x Updates
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@michaelrsweet @dcb314 and others