Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enhance utxo with consumed inputs #1398

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Enhance utxo with consumed inputs #1398

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

samuelmanzanera
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR improves the UTXO model for the AEIP21 consumed inputs logic.

Type of change

  • Enhancements

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera added mining Involve transaction validation and mining enhancements labels Jan 29, 2024
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera force-pushed the enhance_utxo_with_consumed_inputs branch from ea5645b to 5659140 Compare January 30, 2024 13:47
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera force-pushed the enhance_utxo_with_consumed_inputs branch from 27e3e0e to 73c5a3d Compare January 31, 2024 15:51
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera force-pushed the enhance_utxo_with_consumed_inputs branch from 73c5a3d to 043eaa0 Compare February 1, 2024 15:08
@Neylix Neylix merged commit 95a25b0 into AEIP-21 Feb 5, 2024
1 check passed
@Neylix Neylix deleted the enhance_utxo_with_consumed_inputs branch February 5, 2024 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bchamagne bchamagne bchamagne left review comments

@Neylix Neylix Neylix approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancements mining Involve transaction validation and mining
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@samuelmanzanera @Neylix @bchamagne