Skip to content

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Sep 12, 2025

Previously, a "block scalar" was used in the workflow. This is useful in the case of a multi-line string. However, this string is only a single line. Although it would be useful to break the command up into multiple lines via the use of the line continuation operators, this is not possible due to a quirk of the action. So the use of the "block scalar" is not really beneficial in this case. Furthermore, the use of the "block scalar" might encourage the maintainer to try to split the command into multiple lines as is common practice for complex shell commands in the infrastructure, leading to wasted time.

Previously, a "block scalar" was used in the workflow. This is useful in the case of a multi-line string. However, this string is only a single line. Although it would be useful to break the command up into multiple lines via the use of the line continuation operators, this is not possible due to a quirk of the action. So the use of the "block scalar" is not really beneficial in this case. Furthermore, the use of the "block scalar" might encourage the maintainer to try to split the command into multiple lines as is common practice for complex shell commands in the infrastructure, leading to wasted time.
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Sep 12, 2025
@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Sep 12, 2025
@per1234 per1234 merged commit 82d9e5f into arduino:main Sep 12, 2025
13 checks passed
@per1234 per1234 deleted the simplify-workflow branch September 12, 2025 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant