Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(rules): compute annotated coverage when no label properly #915

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2022

Conversation

frascuchon
Copy link
Member

See #895

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #915 (8cff2b7) into master (66688d0) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #915   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.50%   95.50%           
=======================================
  Files         109      109           
  Lines        4205     4206    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         4016     4017    +1     
  Misses        189      189           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytest 95.50% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...erver/tasks/text_classification/service/service.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ks/text_classification/service/labeling_service.py 98.18% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 66688d0...8cff2b7. Read the comment docs.

@frascuchon frascuchon merged commit 70a1f7d into master Jan 10, 2022
@frascuchon frascuchon deleted the bugfixes/compute-annotated-covered-when-no-label branch January 10, 2022 21:17
dvsrepo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
* 'master' of https://github.com/recognai/rubrix:
  feat(rules): compute total & ann. coverage before label selection (#916)
  fix(rules): compute annotated coverage when no label properly (#915)
  Tutorial: Human-in-the-loop weak supervision with skweak (#869)
  UI: include affected #records to overall coverage/ann. coverage metrics (#914)
  fix lint build (#913)
  UI: manage precision and rules without annotation coverage (#909)
  fix(#876): process 400 response detail properly (#889)
  feat(rules): allow compute partial query rule metrics (#907)
  fix(security): providing default workspace should pass check (#911)
  UI: reset filters from define rules view (#908)
  UI: Show number of created rules in rules management view (#910)
  UI: drop access to rule name field (#904)
  fix(rules): prevent lost rules with dataset updates (#892)
  fix(datasets): process owner as part of dataset id (#870)
  (UI) Rules summary metrics format (#888)
  UI: Improve code snippet for empty workspace (#886)
  fix(UI): Remove case sensitive when filtering labels (#882)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant