# aromanro/DFTAtom

Density Functional Theory in real space, for atoms
C++
Latest commit 47df554 Oct 6, 2019
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
DFTAtom Oct 6, 2019
DFTAtom.sln May 26, 2019

# DFTAtom

Density Functional Theory in real space, for atoms

Description is on the Computational Physics Blog: https://compphys.go.ro/dft-for-an-atom/

### SOME DESCRIPTION

I changed the code to 'shoot' from both 'infinity' and from the nucleus and meet and match the solutions. Still does not work very well for heavy atoms, but for the program purpose it seems to work okish.

As it's LDA and there is the assumption of spherical symmetry (for non occupied shells you don't really have it except for the 'special' cases when you go with LSDA, for the others there is cylindrical symmetry), it kind of works only for noble gases, but you can get quite ok results for other atoms, too.

``````Step: 30
Energy 1s: -3204.75628814 Num nodes: 0
Energy 2s: -546.577960661 Num nodes: 1
Energy 2p: -527.533025107 Num nodes: 0
Energy 3s: -133.369144873 Num nodes: 2
Energy 3p: -124.172862647 Num nodes: 1
Energy 3d: -106.945006737 Num nodes: 0
Energy 4s: -31.2308038208 Num nodes: 3
Energy 4p: -27.1089854743 Num nodes: 2
Energy 4d: -19.4499946904 Num nodes: 1
Energy 4f: -8.95331847594 Num nodes: 0
Energy 5s: -5.88968292298 Num nodes: 4
Energy 5p: -4.40870280587 Num nodes: 3
Energy 5d: -1.91132966098 Num nodes: 2
Energy 6s: -0.626570734867 Num nodes: 5
Energy 6p: -0.293180043718 Num nodes: 4
Etotal = -21861.3469029 Ekin = 21854.6726982 Ecoul = 8632.01604609 Eenuc = -51966.1203929 Exc = -381.915254274

Finished!

1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 4p6 4d10 4f14 5s2 5p6 5d10 6s2 6p6
``````

I used 17 for 'multigrid levels' (that means 131073 nodes) 0.0001 for delta, mixing 0.5 and the max radius 50. The results are not perfect, I guess with some other parameters they might be improved somewhat. The energy levels usually get all decimals given by NIST right, but occasionally the last one is wrong. The problem is for total energies, the total energy gets three decimals right, the partial ones get three or four decimals right. Here are the NIST values for comparison: https://www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-reference-data-electronic-structure-calculations-radon

For a lighter noble gas I get better results, for Argon for example:

``````********************************************************************************
Step: 29
Energy 1s: -113.800134222 Num nodes: 0
Energy 2s: -10.7941723904 Num nodes: 1
Energy 2p: -8.44343924178 Num nodes: 0
Energy 3s: -0.88338408662 Num nodes: 2
Energy 3p: -0.382330129715 Num nodes: 1
Etotal = -525.946199815 Ekin = 524.969812556 Ecoul = 231.45812437 Eenuc = -1253.13198253 Exc = -29.2421542116

Finished!

1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6
``````

I used 14 for 'multigrid levels' (that means 16385 nodes), 0.0005 for delta, mixing 0.5 and the max radius 25. The energy levels results match all given decimals from NIST. The total energy gets five decimals right, the kinetic, coulomb and nuclear energies even six, the exchange correlation one seems to be the worse, with only four decimals (maybe there is room for improvement there?).

Here is the NIST data for comparison: https://www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-reference-data-electronic-structure-calculations-argon

The program is faster than I expected, especially because I went to multi-grid instead of Numerov (or Runge-Kutta) for Poisson, so I expected it to be slower than with the other approach.

You can’t perform that action at this time.