Libraries: dexador, some links, Awesome CL, State of CL 2015

[vindarel]

In this PR I suggest:

• to replace drakma by dexador: http://quickdocs.org/dexador/ (better and sanier API, unicode handling, faster)
• I added some href links but not all
• I reference the Awesome-cl list and the State of CL ecosystem article, both very valuable and doing the same job has this list.

[pnathan]

Does dexador work on ABCL, CLISP, SBCL, ECL (or a lisp in that family), and CCL? I try to ensure the libraries up on a-c-l are pretty cross-implementation?

[vindarel]

Good point. I had to ask here: fukamachi/dexador#27

[pnathan]

Also note that drakma is stupid easy to use: http-request and, voila, a result. That is one reason why I dramatically like it. tbh I don't know how easy dexador is.

…

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:13 PM, vindarel ***@***.***> wrote: Good point. I had to ask here: fukamachi/dexador#27 <fukamachi/dexador#27> — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#58 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAuc4J_jlFKiCVC7Wsj1a-3jxbdNsHH-ks5rOtYwgaJpZM4LZEs7> .

[vindarel]

Dexador is also this easy, besides this presentation is pretty convincing: http://www.slideshare.net/fukamachi/dexador-rises (tbh I barely tried Drakma, but I was beaten by many CL libraries with weird/old/unsufficient design…).

[vindarel]

Hi, Fukamachi answered:

I tested it with SBCL, ABCL, ECL and CCL.
Since Dexador uses usocket as its backend, I expect it's portable enough like Drakma.

Is that enough or I keep a reference to Drakma ? ("Dexador… that aims at replacing Drakma)