Generate generic builder setters for fields taking an objecttype
#724
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We already do this for hand-written extension functions but can now also implement it for setters since
vk_parse
fields are available within the builder generator code: when a field refers to another field for setting itsobjecttype
, thatVkObjectType
field setter is omitted and instead assigned when the object is set, based on a type generic that implements theHandle
trait instead of an untypedu64
.Note that most of this diff is merely code motion: some necessary cleanups such as replacing tuples with infinitely-more-self-descriptive structs.