Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.46.1 #688

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 12, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.46.0 -> 5.46.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.46.0 -> 5.46.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.46.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.46.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit da0ba4d into master Dec 12, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 12, 2022 21:39
@dzucconi
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.1.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant