feat: add tensorrt_yolox package

[manato]

Description

This PR aims to add the tensorrt_yolox package into the series of perception modules in autoware.universe.
The tensorrt_yolox package that works with autoware has been published in separated repository. This PR integrates the package's contents into autoware.universe.

Related links

• TIER IV INTERNAL LINK
• https://github.com/tier4/tensorrt_yolox

Tests performed

# build
colcon build --symlink-install --cmake-args -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release --packages-up-to tensorrt_yolox

# run
ros2 run tensorrt_yolox tensorrt_yolox_node_exe --ros-args -p model_path:=install/tensorrt_yolox/share/tensorrt_yolox/data/yolox-tiny.onnx -p label_path:=install/tensorrt_yolox/share/tensorrt_yolox/data/label.txt -r /tensorrt_yolox/in/image:=/image_raw

Notes for reviewers

I've added small modifications listed below from the original repository

• treating labels as case insensitive
• treating the PERSON label in the same way as the PEDESTRIAN label for COCO dataset compatibility

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[wep21]

I think it's better to separate tensorrt_yolox, tensorrt_common, cuda_utils because another package can use common functions in tensorrt_common, cuda_utils.

[manato]

I think it's better to separate tensorrt_yolox, tensorrt_common, cuda_utils because another package can use common functions in tensorrt_common, cuda_utils.

@wep21
I really appreciate your suggestion. I agree with you, so let me confirm where to put tensorrt_common and cuda_utils for further modification. Do you think autoware.universe/common/ is the proper place to put them? If you think a different directory is preferable, I would appreciate it if you let me know.

[yukkysaito]

LGTM

[wep21]

change format to autoware style

[miursh]

@manato You should add your name to maintainer in package.xml.
Also, could you fix CI error?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 10.45% // Head: 10.40% // Decreases project coverage by -0.05% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (440181a) compared to base (eb9fcec).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2370      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.45%   10.40%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1253     1259       +6     
  Lines       91273    91714     +441     
  Branches    20935    20935              
==========================================
  Hits         9541     9541              
- Misses      71593    72034     +441     
  Partials    10139    10139              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	10.42% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from eb9fcec

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...common/include/tensorrt_common/tensorrt_common.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
common/tensorrt_common/src/tensorrt_common.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rt_yolox/include/tensorrt_yolox/tensorrt_yolox.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
perception/tensorrt_yolox/src/tensorrt_yolox.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ception/tensorrt_yolox/src/tensorrt_yolox_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rt_yolox/src/yolox_single_image_inference_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[manato]

@manato You should add your name to maintainer in package.xml. Also, could you fix CI error?

@miursh
Thank you very much for pointing this out. I completely missed it. I added maintainer descriptions in 4fa36ae

Also, the CI errors seem to be gone with the kind help of @yukke42 and @wep21 . I really appreciate their grateful support.