Skip to content

Conversation

leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

Issue number: #2072

Summary

Fix local test example

Changes

  • Changed documentation

User experience

Before
image

After
image

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena requested a review from a team as a code owner March 30, 2023 23:56
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena requested review from heitorlessa and removed request for a team March 30, 2023 23:56
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 30, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 30, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa changed the title docs(idempotency): fix local test example TEST[docs(idempotency): fix local test example Apr 3, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa changed the title TEST[docs(idempotency): fix local test example WIP docs(idempotency): fix local test example Apr 3, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa changed the title WIP docs(idempotency): fix local test example docs(idempotency): fix local test example Apr 3, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa linked an issue Apr 3, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am moving the comment from issue to PR.
Refer: #2072 (comment)

Heitor Lessa:
only last comment before merging is that this part shouldn't work, please double check in case I'm wrong: #2073 (files)
Reason. Unless AWS SDK changed, the DynamoDB client wouldn't connect to DynamoDB Local because the client isn't being replaced, therefore it'd use the real DynamoDB external endpoint

Yeah @heitorlessa, you're right! I was missing it because in my local tests, I was configuring the boto3.session in the app.py file and I forgot to remove it. My bad. I already sent the new code.

@heitorlessa
Copy link
Contributor

heitorlessa commented Apr 5, 2023

@leandrodamascena created PR exposing the SDK Client and accepting a custom SDK client so customers can do this more cleanly.

I'll let you review, once merged, then we can finish this one.

#2087

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pending-release Fix or implementation already in dev waiting to be released label Apr 5, 2023
* develop:
  feat(idempotency): allow custom sdk clients in DynamoDBPersistenceLayer (#2087)
  chore(deps-dev): bump types-python-dateutil from 2.8.19.11 to 2.8.19.12 (#2085)
  chore(deps-dev): bump cfn-lint from 0.76.1 to 0.76.2 (#2084)
  chore(deps-dev): bump aws-cdk from 2.72.0 to 2.72.1 (#2081)
  chore(deps): bump aws-xray-sdk from 2.11.0 to 2.12.0 (#2080)
  update changelog with latest changes
  docs(parser): fix highlighted line (#2064)
@heitorlessa heitorlessa changed the title docs(idempotency): fix local test example docs(idempotency): fixes to testing your code section Apr 5, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa removed the pending-release Fix or implementation already in dev waiting to be released label Apr 5, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa merged commit 1f92c59 into aws-powertools:develop Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: Fix local tests example in the Idempotency Testing Your Code section
3 participants