Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IR] Implementation of QoS Features #1

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Mar 29, 2019
Merged

[IR] Implementation of QoS Features #1

merged 17 commits into from
Mar 29, 2019

Conversation

mm318
Copy link

@mm318 mm318 commented Mar 20, 2019

Implementation of QoS features in the rcl package.

mm318 and others added 8 commits March 19, 2019 13:24
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
* EDIT: alphabetical order cmakelist and imports

Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
dirk-thomas and others added 2 commits March 20, 2019 08:37
Fix errors, remove redundant information, and try to make sentences more concise.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Perron <jacob@openrobotics.org>
rcl/include/rcl/event.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rcl/include/rcl/event.h Show resolved Hide resolved
RCL_PUBLIC
RCL_WARN_UNUSED
rcl_ret_t
rcl_publisher_event_init(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All these functions should have documentation added.

rcl/include/rcl/event.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rcl/include/rcl/event.h Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -99,6 +99,13 @@ typedef rmw_ret_t rcl_ret_t;
/// Argument is not a valid log level rule
#define RCL_RET_INVALID_LOG_LEVEL_RULE 1020

// rcl event specific ret codes in 20XX
/// Invalid rcl_event_t given return code.
#define RCL_RET_EVENT_INVALID 2000
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this just the same as a bad parameter error code?

rcl/src/rcl/event.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rcl/src/rcl/event.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rmw_ret_t ret = rmw_take_event(event->impl->rmw_handle, event_status, &taken);
if (RMW_RET_OK != ret) {
RCL_SET_ERROR_MSG(rmw_get_error_string().str);
if (RMW_RET_BAD_ALLOC == ret) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we have a function already for converting rmw errors to rcl errors

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think overall our error types still need to be better defined.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think overall our error types still need to be better defined.

What are we missing?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are far fewer RMW_RET_* types than RCL_RET_* types. Getting a rcl_ret_t from a rmw_ret_t feels like rcl_ret_t isn't living up to its potential.

mm318 and others added 3 commits March 21, 2019 13:55
Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp <eknapp@amazon.com>
(rmw_events_t::events to point to rmw_event_t instead of rmw_event_t::data)

Signed-off-by: Miaofei <miaofei@amazon.com>
rcl/include/rcl/event.h Show resolved Hide resolved
rcl/include/rcl/event.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
RCL_PUBLIC
RCL_WARN_UNUSED
rmw_event_t *
rcl_event_get_rmw_handle(const rcl_event_t * event);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is this used? Is there a reason we need to expose the rmw layer above the rcl layer?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it is not used anywhere. But neither is rcl_subscription_get_rmw_handle(). However, rcl_publisher_get_rmw_handle() is used in rclcpp...

Let's just leave it here for now.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently, this function is needed by the SET_ADD_RMW macro in wait.c.

rcl/src/rcl/event.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
bool taken;
RCL_CHECK_ARGUMENT_FOR_NULL(event, RCL_RET_INVALID_ARGUMENT);
RCL_CHECK_ARGUMENT_FOR_NULL(event_status, RCL_RET_INVALID_ARGUMENT);
rmw_ret_t ret = rmw_take_event(event->impl->rmw_handle, event_status, &taken);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems a little odd that we're diverging rcl_take_event and rmw_take_event in terms of having the extra parameter to determine if something was actually taken. Why can't they both work the same.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am for removing the taken parameter.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will remove the taken parameter.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On second thought, it looks like the other rmw_take() functions also have this extra taken boolean. We should probably leave it in there to be consistent.

@mm318 mm318 merged commit ceb2579 into qos_reviewed Mar 29, 2019
emersonknapp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
Call rcutils_logging_shutdown() in TearDown
to avoid leaking logging internal objects.

As any change to this file makes test_logging_named
fail, this releaxes the EXACT_EQ call on
g_last_log_event.location->line_number[1]. Instead
of looking for a particular value, we test an invariant
of the field (line numbers are positive).

Finally, in test_logging_function, initialize g_counter
and g_function_called values to make sure the test will
not fail even if `--gtest_repeat=2` is passed.

Other tests are still failing when this flag is passed:
[  FAILED  ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once
[  FAILED  ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst
[  FAILED  ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle

However, fixing those tests would require actually changing
the logging implementation which is out of the scope of this
change.

Before:

    $ ./test_logging_macros
    Running main() from gmock_main.cc
    [==========] Running 8 tests from 1 test case.
    [----------] Global test environment set-up.
    [----------] 8 tests from TestLoggingMacros
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle (302 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle (302 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy (0 ms)
    [----------] 8 tests from TestLoggingMacros (605 ms total)

    [----------] Global test environment tear-down
    [==========] 8 tests from 1 test case ran. (605 ms total)
    [  PASSED  ] 8 tests.

    =================================================================
    ==19903==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

    Direct leak of 504 byte(s) in 7 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7fd640c1fb50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50)
        #1 0x7fd64091cbb5 in __default_allocate (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5)
        #2 0x7fd64092f1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0)
        #3 0x7fd640926641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641)
        #4 0x7fd6409261ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab)
        #5 0x564405fc6627 in TestLoggingMacros::SetUp() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x29627)
        #6 0x564406045999 in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0xa8999)
        #7 0x564406037b7d in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x9ab7d)
        #8 0x564405fe4503 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x47503)
        #9 0x564405fe59e4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x489e4)
        ros2#10 0x564405fe6588 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x49588)
        ros2#11 0x564406001699 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x64699)
        ros2#12 0x56440604844c in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0xab44c)
        ros2#13 0x564406039e46 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x9ce46)
        ros2#14 0x564405ffe42d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x6142d)
        ros2#15 0x564405fd197d in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x3497d)
        ros2#16 0x564405fd18c3 in main (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x348c3)
        ros2#17 0x7fd63fd84b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)

After:

    $ ./test_logging_macros
    Running main() from gmock_main.cc
    [==========] Running 9 tests from 1 test case.
    [----------] Global test environment set-up.
    [----------] 9 tests from TestLoggingMacros
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_empty
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_empty (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst (0 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle (303 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle (302 ms)
    [ RUN      ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy
    [       OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy (0 ms)
    [----------] 9 tests from TestLoggingMacros (605 ms total)

    [----------] Global test environment tear-down
    [==========] 9 tests from 1 test case ran. (606 ms total)
    [  PASSED  ] 9 tests.

[1] https://testing.googleblog.com/2015/01/testing-on-toilet-change-detector-tests.html

Signed-off-by: Thomas Moulard <tmoulard@amazon.com>
emersonknapp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
Add rcutils_logging_shutdown() every time needed
in test_logging.cpp. Remove spurious `g_rcutils_logging_initialized = false;`
preventing rcutils_logging_shutdown() from freeing memory.

Before:
  $ ./test_logging
  Running main() from ../../../install-asan/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_main.cc
  [==========] Running 5 tests from 1 test case.
  [----------] Global test environment set-up.
  [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logging
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logging (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_log_severity
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_log_severity (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy (0 ms)
  [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging (0 ms total)

  [----------] Global test environment tear-down
  [==========] 5 tests from 1 test case ran. (0 ms total)
  [  PASSED  ] 5 tests.

  =================================================================
  ==1676==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

  Direct leak of 72 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
      #0 0x7f7a7229db50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50)
      #1 0x7f7a71f9abb5 in __default_allocate (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5)
      #2 0x7f7a71fad1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0)
      #3 0x7f7a71fa4641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641)
      #4 0x7f7a71fa41ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab)
      #5 0x561e9d22c972 in TestLogging_test_logging_Test::TestBody() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x1a972)
      #6 0x561e9d2b545d in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa345d)
      #7 0x561e9d2a71c7 in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x951c7)
      #8 0x561e9d2534c9 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x414c9)
      #9 0x561e9d2548f4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x428f4)
      ros2#10 0x561e9d255498 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x43498)
      ros2#11 0x561e9d2705a9 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5e5a9)
      ros2#12 0x561e9d2b7f10 in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa5f10)
      ros2#13 0x561e9d2a9490 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x97490)
      ros2#14 0x561e9d26d33d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5b33d)
      ros2#15 0x561e9d24088c in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e88c)
      ros2#16 0x561e9d2407d2 in main (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e7d2)
      ros2#17 0x7f7a71402b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)

  Direct leak of 72 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
      #0 0x7f7a7229db50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50)
      #1 0x7f7a71f9abb5 in __default_allocate (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5)
      #2 0x7f7a71fad1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0)
      #3 0x7f7a71fa4641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641)
      #4 0x7f7a71fa41ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab)
      #5 0x561e9d22a9b6 in TestLogging_test_logging_initialization_Test::TestBody() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x189b6)
      #6 0x561e9d2b545d in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa345d)
      #7 0x561e9d2a71c7 in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x951c7)
      #8 0x561e9d2534c9 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x414c9)
      #9 0x561e9d2548f4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x428f4)
      ros2#10 0x561e9d255498 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x43498)
      ros2#11 0x561e9d2705a9 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5e5a9)
      ros2#12 0x561e9d2b7f10 in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa5f10)
      ros2#13 0x561e9d2a9490 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x97490)
      ros2#14 0x561e9d26d33d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5b33d)
      ros2#15 0x561e9d24088c in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e88c)
      ros2#16 0x561e9d2407d2 in main (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e7d2)
      ros2#17 0x7f7a71402b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)

  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 144 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

After:
  $ ./test_logging
  Running main() from ../../../install-asan/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_main.cc
  [==========] Running 5 tests from 1 test case.
  [----------] Global test environment set-up.
  [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logging
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logging (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_log_severity
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_log_severity (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities (0 ms)
  [ RUN      ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy
  [       OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy (0 ms)
  [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging (1 ms total)

  [----------] Global test environment tear-down
  [==========] 5 tests from 1 test case ran. (1 ms total)
  [  PASSED  ] 5 tests.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Moulard <tmoulard@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
6 participants