first work toward adding ros time support #12

tfoote · 2015-12-31T21:19:57Z

Add basic time support datatypes and functions to rcl.

wjwwood · 2016-01-01T00:53:19Z

rcl/include/rcl/time.h

+/// Retrieve the current time as a rcl_ros_time_point_t struct.
+/* This function returns the time from a ros clock unless simulation_time
+ * is active. In which case it returns the latest simulated time.
+ * The closest equivalent would be to std::chrono::steady_clock::now();


Few things, first should it say it returns time from a system clock and not a ros clock? Second, wouldn't the closest equivalent be a system_clock?

wjwwood · 2016-01-01T01:51:26Z

This looks pretty good to me, other than a few inline comments, I have some high level questions:

Is this affected by the rcl_init/rcl_shutdown cycle?
In the design doc you mention blocking behavior and callbacks on negative time jumps, I don't see any of that here, should it be?

Also, I was imagining some of the possible corner cases:

What happens when the ros time is set, but the simulated time is not on? Should it turn it on?
Is there a race condition with retrieving the ros time because you have to check the bool and then fetch the time when it is false?
- In more detail: you call get time, you check the bool and it's true, in another thread you disable it and set the simulated time to 0, in the original thread you finally get the simulated time but it is wrong.
- Could you work around this by using just the time uint64 and reserving max_uint64 as "sim time is off"?

Thanks for taking the time to document and test it!

tfoote · 2016-02-11T11:34:58Z

I've completely refactored the implementation to follow the new approach @wjwwood and I worked out. The implementation is mostly complete and has basic unit tests. I expect to polish it up with some more documentation and improved test coverage. And possibly add a few helper functions.

Linux CI is passing: http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/949/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_osx/794/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1044/ (one linter error in 72fd14d)

tfoote · 2016-02-11T22:26:49Z

Ready for review:

CI started:
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/950/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_osx/797/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1047/

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-11T23:17:50Z

Where does the term time point come from? It sounds kind of made up. It is also not mentioned in the design article. Therefore something more common might be better (e.g. just time or timestamp).

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-11T23:18:36Z

rcl/include/rcl/time.h

+struct rcl_ros_time_source_storage_t;
+typedef struct rcl_time_point_t
+{
+  rcl_time_point_imp_t ns;


What does ns stand for?

nanoseconds I'll rename the variables.

tfoote · 2016-02-11T23:25:33Z

time point is for std::chrono nomenclature http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/time_point

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-11T23:25:42Z

rcl/include/rcl/time.h

+* The two time points must be using the same abstraction. And the resultant
+* duration will also be of the same abstraction.
+*
+* The value will be computed as finish - start = duration. If start is after


I would expect the equation the other way around: duration = finish - start.

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-11T23:32:48Z

rcl/src/rcl/time.c

+rcl_ret_t rcl_difference_times(rcl_time_point_t * start, rcl_time_point_t * finish,
+  rcl_duration_t * delta)
+{
+  if (!start->time_source->type == finish->time_source->type) {


Why not !=?

tfoote · 2016-02-11T23:34:20Z

Windows failed other tests in rcl but unreleated to my testing. @wjwwood mentioned that he's running things on the server too for testing which might have been the cause.

http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1047/testReport/junit/projectrootC_.J.workspace.ci_windows.ws.src.ros2.system_tests/test_rclcpp/gtest_executor__rmw_opensplice_cpp/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1047/testReport/junit/projectrootC_.J.workspace.ci_windows.ws.src.ros2.rcl/rcl/test_node/

Running main() from gtest_main.cc
[==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 2 tests from TestNodeFixture
[ RUN      ] TestNodeFixture.test_rcl_node_accessors
========================================================================================
Report      : ERROR
Date        : Thu Feb 11 15:11:40 Pacific Standard Time 2016
Description : Failed to connect to/create the domain with ID 42
Node        : eatable
Process     : test_node.exe <7172>
Thread      : 3296
Internals   : V6.4.140407OSS/3b83e82/3b83e82/gapi::gapi_domainParticipantFactory::gapi_domainParticipantFactory_create_participant/gapi_domainParticipantFactory.c/285/0/1455232300.520908903

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-11T23:35:29Z

rcl/src/rcl/timer.c

  return RCL_RET_OK;
 }

 rcl_ret_t
-rcl_timer_get_time_since_last_call(const rcl_timer_t * timer, uint64_t * time_since_last_call)
+rcl_timer_get_time_since_last_call(const rcl_timer_t * timer,


Please wrap after opening parenthesis.

tfoote · 2016-02-12T00:44:14Z

CI restarted:
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/954
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_osx/798/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1048/

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-12T00:48:53Z

LGTM. Lets see what Jenkins opinion is...

This is as defined in http://design.ros2.org/articles/clock_and_time.html This has the core functionality implemented in rcl. It will need to be extended into each client library. There are also areas to fill in for more support for duration, rates, and timers.

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-12T02:42:18Z

These jobs actually build with all rmw impl. and not only OpenSplice as the last set:

http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/960/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_osx/800/
http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1050/ (same tests will fail with the current master http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1051/ and are unrelated to this PR)

tfoote · 2016-02-12T04:19:35Z

1050 does not fail with these errors, which would suggest that it's related to running just on opensplice.

@wjwwood is seeing the same rcl errors on his branch. We looked into the errors and it appears that those tests are supposed to be skipped on windows with opensplice

dirk-thomas · 2016-02-12T05:46:38Z

I would vote to go ahead with this PR and merge it since it doesn't have any regressions.

tfoote · 2016-02-12T08:06:22Z

For further confirmation I ran a build on master and that it shows the same behavior with the failing rcl tests: http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/1054/#showFailuresLink They are only exposed when running with connext and fastrtps disabled on windows.

first work toward adding ros time support

use _strdup() on windows to avoid compiler warning

Call rcutils_logging_shutdown() in TearDown to avoid leaking logging internal objects. As any change to this file makes test_logging_named fail, this releaxes the EXACT_EQ call on g_last_log_event.location->line_number[1]. Instead of looking for a particular value, we test an invariant of the field (line numbers are positive). Finally, in test_logging_function, initialize g_counter and g_function_called values to make sure the test will not fail even if `--gtest_repeat=2` is passed. Other tests are still failing when this flag is passed: [ FAILED ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once [ FAILED ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst [ FAILED ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle However, fixing those tests would require actually changing the logging implementation which is out of the scope of this change. Before: $ ./test_logging_macros Running main() from gmock_main.cc [==========] Running 8 tests from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 8 tests from TestLoggingMacros [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle (302 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle (302 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy (0 ms) [----------] 8 tests from TestLoggingMacros (605 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 8 tests from 1 test case ran. (605 ms total) [ PASSED ] 8 tests. ================================================================= ==19903==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 504 byte(s) in 7 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fd640c1fb50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50) #1 0x7fd64091cbb5 in __default_allocate (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5) #2 0x7fd64092f1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0) #3 0x7fd640926641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641) #4 0x7fd6409261ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/.../ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab) #5 0x564405fc6627 in TestLoggingMacros::SetUp() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x29627) #6 0x564406045999 in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0xa8999) #7 0x564406037b7d in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x9ab7d) #8 0x564405fe4503 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x47503) #9 0x564405fe59e4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x489e4) ros2#10 0x564405fe6588 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x49588) ros2#11 0x564406001699 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x64699) ros2#12 0x56440604844c in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0xab44c) ros2#13 0x564406039e46 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x9ce46) ros2#14 0x564405ffe42d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x6142d) ros2#15 0x564405fd197d in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x3497d) ros2#16 0x564405fd18c3 in main (/home/.../ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging_macros+0x348c3) ros2#17 0x7fd63fd84b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) After: $ ./test_logging_macros Running main() from gmock_main.cc [==========] Running 9 tests from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 9 tests from TestLoggingMacros [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_empty [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_empty (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_named (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_once (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_expression (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_function (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_throttle (303 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logging_skipfirst_throttle (302 ms) [ RUN ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy [ OK ] TestLoggingMacros.test_logger_hierarchy (0 ms) [----------] 9 tests from TestLoggingMacros (605 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 9 tests from 1 test case ran. (606 ms total) [ PASSED ] 9 tests. [1] https://testing.googleblog.com/2015/01/testing-on-toilet-change-detector-tests.html Signed-off-by: Thomas Moulard <tmoulard@amazon.com>

Add rcutils_logging_shutdown() every time needed in test_logging.cpp. Remove spurious `g_rcutils_logging_initialized = false;` preventing rcutils_logging_shutdown() from freeing memory. Before: $ ./test_logging Running main() from ../../../install-asan/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_main.cc [==========] Running 5 tests from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logging [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logging (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_log_severity [ OK ] TestLogging.test_log_severity (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy (0 ms) [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging (0 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 5 tests from 1 test case ran. (0 ms total) [ PASSED ] 5 tests. ================================================================= ==1676==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 72 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f7a7229db50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50) #1 0x7f7a71f9abb5 in __default_allocate (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5) #2 0x7f7a71fad1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0) #3 0x7f7a71fa4641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641) #4 0x7f7a71fa41ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab) #5 0x561e9d22c972 in TestLogging_test_logging_Test::TestBody() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x1a972) #6 0x561e9d2b545d in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa345d) #7 0x561e9d2a71c7 in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x951c7) #8 0x561e9d2534c9 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x414c9) #9 0x561e9d2548f4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x428f4) ros2#10 0x561e9d255498 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x43498) ros2#11 0x561e9d2705a9 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5e5a9) ros2#12 0x561e9d2b7f10 in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa5f10) ros2#13 0x561e9d2a9490 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x97490) ros2#14 0x561e9d26d33d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5b33d) ros2#15 0x561e9d24088c in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e88c) ros2#16 0x561e9d2407d2 in main (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e7d2) ros2#17 0x7f7a71402b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) Direct leak of 72 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f7a7229db50 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb50) #1 0x7f7a71f9abb5 in __default_allocate (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x8bb5) #2 0x7f7a71fad1b0 in rcutils_string_map_init (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x1b1b0) #3 0x7f7a71fa4641 in rcutils_logging_initialize_with_allocator (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x12641) #4 0x7f7a71fa41ab in rcutils_logging_initialize (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/install-asan/rcutils/lib/librcutils.so+0x121ab) #5 0x561e9d22a9b6 in TestLogging_test_logging_initialization_Test::TestBody() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x189b6) #6 0x561e9d2b545d in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa345d) #7 0x561e9d2a71c7 in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x951c7) #8 0x561e9d2534c9 in testing::Test::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x414c9) #9 0x561e9d2548f4 in testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x428f4) ros2#10 0x561e9d255498 in testing::TestCase::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x43498) ros2#11 0x561e9d2705a9 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5e5a9) ros2#12 0x561e9d2b7f10 in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0xa5f10) ros2#13 0x561e9d2a9490 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x97490) ros2#14 0x561e9d26d33d in testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x5b33d) ros2#15 0x561e9d24088c in RUN_ALL_TESTS() (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e88c) ros2#16 0x561e9d2407d2 in main (/home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/tmoulard/ros2_ws/build-asan/rcutils/test_logging+0x2e7d2) ros2#17 0x7f7a71402b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 144 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). After: $ ./test_logging Running main() from ../../../install-asan/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_vendor/src/gtest_main.cc [==========] Running 5 tests from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logging_initialization (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logging [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logging (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_log_severity [ OK ] TestLogging.test_log_severity (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severities (0 ms) [ RUN ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy [ OK ] TestLogging.test_logger_severity_hierarchy (0 ms) [----------] 5 tests from TestLogging (1 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 5 tests from 1 test case ran. (1 ms total) [ PASSED ] 5 tests. Signed-off-by: Thomas Moulard <tmoulard@amazon.com>

use target_compile_definitions instead of set_target_properties

rename rmw_listener_cb_t->rmw_listener_callback_t

tfoote added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Dec 31, 2015

tfoote force-pushed the ros_time branch from c949bf0 to df3487e Compare December 31, 2015 22:30

tfoote added in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Dec 31, 2015

wjwwood reviewed Jan 1, 2016
View reviewed changes

tfoote force-pushed the ros_time branch from df3487e to 8f31da3 Compare February 11, 2016 10:58

dirk-thomas reviewed Feb 11, 2016
View reviewed changes

tfoote force-pushed the ros_time branch from 9312a5c to 4b7c0bb Compare February 12, 2016 01:13

wjwwood mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2016

C typesupport tests #21

Merged

tfoote added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2016

Merge pull request #12 from ros2/ros_time

aaa773e

first work toward adding ros time support

tfoote merged commit aaa773e into master Feb 12, 2016

tfoote removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Feb 12, 2016

tfoote deleted the ros_time branch February 12, 2016 08:06

This was referenced Feb 12, 2016

Create an equivalent to ros::Time ros2/ros2#178

Closed

rcl test failures when run with only opensplice on windows #22

Closed

xabxx mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2019

fix heap buffer overflow in test_security_directory #423

Merged

emersonknapp pushed a commit to aws-ros-dev/rcl that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019

Merge pull request ros2#12 from ros2/fix_strdup_warning

f8e91bd

use _strdup() on windows to avoid compiler warning

ivanpauno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2020

Merge pull request #12 from ros2/package_specific_visibility_macros

e197393

use target_compile_definitions instead of set_target_properties

mauropasse pushed a commit to mauropasse/rcl that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2021

Merge pull request ros2#12 from mauropasse/mauro/clean-events-executor

ffd59eb

rename rmw_listener_cb_t->rmw_listener_callback_t

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

first work toward adding ros time support #12

first work toward adding ros time support #12

tfoote commented Dec 31, 2015

wjwwood Jan 1, 2016

wjwwood commented Jan 1, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

tfoote Feb 11, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016

first work toward adding ros time support #12

first work toward adding ros time support #12

Conversation

tfoote commented Dec 31, 2015

wjwwood Jan 1, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

wjwwood commented Jan 1, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tfoote Feb 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tfoote commented Feb 11, 2016

dirk-thomas Feb 11, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016

dirk-thomas commented Feb 12, 2016

tfoote commented Feb 12, 2016