Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dynamodb): table with replicas fails to deploy with "Unresolved resource dependencies" error #13889

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2021

Conversation

skinny85
Copy link
Contributor

When creating the Custom Resources that implement the global tables functionality,
we add dependencies between them, as you can't create replicas of the same Table concurrently.
However, if the Stack the Table is part of is env-agnostic,
we also add a CFN Condition to the Custom Resource that checks whether the given region is the deployed-to region,
and skip creating the replica in that case (as the Table itself acts as the replica in this case).
But that Condition is not compatible with the dependency clause,
as the resource will not exist if the Condition is false.

Use a trick, and instead of using a DependsOn,
add a CFN metadata that refers to the other Custom Resource through a Ref expression,
which adds an implicit dependency,
and wrap the entire Metadata in a Fn::If,
guarded by the same Condition the other Custom Resource uses.

Noticed by a customer in #13671 (comment).


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

…pendencies"

When creating the Custom Resources that implement the global tables functionality,
we add dependencies between them, as you can't create replicas of the same Table concurrently.
However, if the Stack the Table is part of is env-agnostic,
we also add a CFN Condition to the Custom Resource that checks whether the given region is the deployed-to region,
and skip creating the replica in that case (as the Table itself acts as the replica in this case).
But that Condition is not compatible with the dependency clause,
as the resource will not exist if the Condition is false.

Use a trick, and instead of using a DependsOn,
add a CFN metadata that refers to the other Custom Resource through a Ref expression,
which adds an implicit dependency,
and wrap the entire Metadata in a Fn::If,
guarded by the same Condition the other Custom Resource uses.

Noticed by a customer in aws#13671 (comment).
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Mar 31, 2021

Copy link
Contributor

@RomainMuller RomainMuller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's really clever! Love it!

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 31, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@RomainMuller RomainMuller changed the title fix(dynamodb): Table with replicas fails to deploy with "Unresolved resource dependencies" error fix(dynamodb): table with replicas fails to deploy with "Unresolved resource dependencies" error Mar 31, 2021
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: 93c7ae1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 31, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 5c99d0d into aws:master Mar 31, 2021
hollanddd pushed a commit to hollanddd/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
…esource dependencies" error (aws#13889)

When creating the Custom Resources that implement the global tables functionality,
we add dependencies between them, as you can't create replicas of the same Table concurrently.
However, if the Stack the Table is part of is env-agnostic,
we also add a CFN Condition to the Custom Resource that checks whether the given region is the deployed-to region,
and skip creating the replica in that case (as the Table itself acts as the replica in this case).
But that Condition is not compatible with the dependency clause,
as the resource will not exist if the Condition is false.

Use a trick, and instead of using a DependsOn,
add a CFN metadata that refers to the other Custom Resource through a Ref expression,
which adds an implicit dependency,
and wrap the entire Metadata in a Fn::If,
guarded by the same Condition the other Custom Resource uses.

Noticed by a customer in aws#13671 (comment).

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
@skinny85 skinny85 deleted the fix/dynamodb-replicas-condition branch March 31, 2021 17:46
hollanddd pushed a commit to hollanddd/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2021
…esource dependencies" error (aws#13889)

When creating the Custom Resources that implement the global tables functionality,
we add dependencies between them, as you can't create replicas of the same Table concurrently.
However, if the Stack the Table is part of is env-agnostic,
we also add a CFN Condition to the Custom Resource that checks whether the given region is the deployed-to region,
and skip creating the replica in that case (as the Table itself acts as the replica in this case).
But that Condition is not compatible with the dependency clause,
as the resource will not exist if the Condition is false.

Use a trick, and instead of using a DependsOn,
add a CFN metadata that refers to the other Custom Resource through a Ref expression,
which adds an implicit dependency,
and wrap the entire Metadata in a Fn::If,
guarded by the same Condition the other Custom Resource uses.

Noticed by a customer in aws#13671 (comment).

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
@aws-cdk/aws-dynamodb Related to Amazon DynamoDB contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants