Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: verify with Dafny 4.6 #1072

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

chore: verify with Dafny 4.6 #1072

merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

ajewellamz
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@ajewellamz ajewellamz requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2024 12:02
josecorella
josecorella previously approved these changes May 30, 2024
&& ret.value[PREFIX_LEN..PREFIX_LEN+LENGTH_LEN] == U32ToBigEndian(|a.L|).value
// && ret.value[PREFIX_LEN..PREFIX_LEN+LENGTH_LEN] == U32ToBigEndian(|a.L|).value
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we dropping this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because 1) it doesn't verify anymore and 2) I don't think it's actually true.

@seebees
Copy link
Contributor

seebees commented May 30, 2024

This looks good. Can we update the MPL at least. And maybe the ESDK?

Also, I think that 4.6 is the latests Dafny version. Does that just work?

@seebees seebees changed the title chore: verify with 4.5 chore: verify with 4.6 May 30, 2024
@seebees seebees changed the title chore: verify with 4.6 chore: verify with Dafny 4.6 May 30, 2024
seebees
seebees previously approved these changes May 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@seebees seebees left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@seebees seebees left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ajewellamz ajewellamz merged commit 9db6e78 into main May 30, 2024
30 checks passed
@ajewellamz ajewellamz deleted the ajewell/verify-with-45 branch May 30, 2024 20:12
rishav-karanjit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
## [3.5.0](v3.4.0...v3.5.0) (2024-05-30)

### Features

* **DynamoDbEncryption:** Add GetEncryptedDataKeyDescription operation ([#856](#856)) ([8f8471a](8f8471a))
* improve verification ([#1020](#1020)) ([cbde4ef](cbde4ef))
* simplify structured encryption ([#866](#866)) ([a70a569](a70a569))

### Maintenance

* allow Legacy to use subclass of DynamoDBEncryptor ([#1073](#1073)) ([135acd9](135acd9))
* bump MPL to 1.4 ([#1067](#1067)) ([51bbab5](51bbab5))
* **Java-Release:** update release commands and use SNAPSHOT builds ([#995](#995)) ([ac9b79e](ac9b79e))
* reformat and enforce formatting ([#1035](#1035)) ([8a76a9d](8a76a9d))
* verify with Dafny 4.6 ([#1072](#1072)) ([9db6e78](9db6e78))
ajewellamz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
* chore(release): 3.5.0

## [3.5.0](v3.4.0...v3.5.0) (2024-05-30)

### Features

* **DynamoDbEncryption:** Add GetEncryptedDataKeyDescription operation ([#856](#856)) ([8f8471a](8f8471a))
* improve verification ([#1020](#1020)) ([cbde4ef](cbde4ef))
* simplify structured encryption ([#866](#866)) ([a70a569](a70a569))

### Maintenance

* allow Legacy to use subclass of DynamoDBEncryptor ([#1073](#1073)) ([135acd9](135acd9))
* bump MPL to 1.4 ([#1067](#1067)) ([51bbab5](51bbab5))
* **Java-Release:** update release commands and use SNAPSHOT builds ([#995](#995)) ([ac9b79e](ac9b79e))
* reformat and enforce formatting ([#1035](#1035)) ([8a76a9d](8a76a9d))
* verify with Dafny 4.6 ([#1072](#1072)) ([9db6e78](9db6e78))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants