SQS ReceiveMessageRequest attributeNames() are not Message Attributes

[WillyGitty]

Describe the bug

In SQS, ReceiveMessageRequest.builder().attributeNames() Enum values does not correspond the the message attributes

https://sdk.amazonaws.com/java/api/latest/software/amazon/awssdk/services/sqs/model/ReceiveMessageRequest.html

• All
• ApproximateFirstReceiveTimestamp
• ApproximateReceiveCount
• AWSTraceHeader
• SenderId
• SentTimestamp
• MessageDeduplicationId
• MessageGroupId
• SequenceNumber

Right now the method accepts the QueueAttributeName enum that does not contains those values.

https://sdk.amazonaws.com/java/api/latest/software/amazon/awssdk/services/sqs/model/QueueAttributeName.html

Expected Behavior

When trying to receive message with some specific attributes I should be able to specify them using the correct Enum.

Current Behavior

The method attributeNames() should use an Enum with message attributes values (ex: MessageAttributeNames)

Steps to Reproduce

For example, now since the attributeNames is scoped to the wrong enum, we cant get a property like ApproximateReceiveCount

        final ReceiveMessageRequest receiveMessageRequest = ReceiveMessageRequest.builder()
            .queueUrl(queueUrl)
            // I cant call an enum with the ApproximateReceiveCount
            .attributeNames(QueueAttributeName.???) 
            // However this works
            .attributeNamesWithStrings("ApproximateReceiveCount")
            .maxNumberOfMessages(10)
            .waitTimeSeconds(seconds)
            .build();

As you can see .attributeNamesWithStrings("ApproximateReceiveCount") does behave correctly but It is impossible to do the same with the Enum version .attributeNames(???).

Possible Solution

Implement a new enum (ex: MessageAttributeNames)
that coincide with the following properties

• All
• ApproximateFirstReceiveTimestamp
• ApproximateReceiveCountAWSTraceHeader
• SenderId
• SentTimestamp
• MessageDeduplicationId
• MessageGroupId
• SequenceNumber

Context

Your Environment

• AWS Java SDK version used: 2.17.1
• JDK version used: openjdk 11
• Operating System and version: Linux with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

[debora-ito]

Hi @WillyGitty this is a duplicate of #1117.

We have reached out to the service team about this, they are aware of the problem and working on a plan to fix this in a way that won't break customers of the API.

In any case, I'll go ahead and close this. Please continue to track updates in the other GitHub issue.

[github-actions]

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.