Skip to content

Conversation

l3ku
Copy link

@l3ku l3ku commented Nov 4, 2022

Issue #, if available:
#3397

Description of changes:
Removed defaulting to empty environment variables in the container definition to be provided to the CreateModelPackage API call. The empty dict caused a problem when trying to create a model (CreateModel API call) with some environment variables so that the model package can be used in an endpoint: environment variable map cannot be specified both at Model Package {} and Model {...}.

Fixes: #3397

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link
Member

@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run all

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3457 (cdd4ac7) into master (1fa2377) will decrease coverage by 0.29%.
The diff coverage is 87.26%.

❗ Current head cdd4ac7 differs from pull request most recent head c2201b7. Consider uploading reports for the commit c2201b7 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3457      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.17%   88.87%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         204      212       +8     
  Lines       18979    20482    +1503     
==========================================
+ Hits        16924    18203    +1279     
- Misses       2055     2279     +224     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/feature_store/feature_group.py 76.52% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/huggingface/model.py 89.87% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/pipeline.py 85.33% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/sklearn/model.py 92.98% <ø> (-1.76%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/sparkml/model.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...sagemaker/workflow/monitor_batch_transform_step.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/xgboost/model.py 96.36% <ø> (-1.82%) ⬇️
...agemaker/model_monitor/clarify_model_monitoring.py 89.84% <27.58%> (-5.09%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/transformer.py 85.41% <40.62%> (-9.07%) ⬇️
.../sagemaker/huggingface/training_compiler/config.py 90.47% <50.00%> (ø)
... and 55 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@vikas0203 vikas0203 requested review from a team and claytonparnell and removed request for a team November 23, 2022 20:40
Copy link
Contributor

@vikas0203 vikas0203 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run all

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@vikas0203 vikas0203 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run all

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@vikas0203 vikas0203 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run all

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 40add6a
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@vikas0203 vikas0203 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run unit-tests

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: cdd4ac7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

kace and others added 8 commits December 12, 2022 17:21
…aws#3530)

Currently the analysis configuration schema of SageMaker Clarify API
allows the content_type configuration "image/jpeg" and "image/jpg",
but the service side validation only accepts the former which is the
registered MIME type for JPEG (see rfc3745 and JPEG specification).
The commit removes the latter from the schema to avoid confusion and
enable early API validation.
Co-authored-by: Anton Repushko <repuanto@amazon.com>
…st_feature_group (aws#3534)

Co-authored-by: Eric Zou <zoueric@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Yiming Zou <imingtsou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Chatham <bdchatham@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: jiapinw <95885824+jiapinw@users.noreply.github.com>
@knikure knikure assigned claytonparnell and unassigned vikas0203 May 2, 2023
@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala self-assigned this Aug 14, 2023
@mufaddal-rohawala
Copy link
Member

@l3ku can you help rebase this PR with latest master and resolve conflicts?

@mufaddal-rohawala
Copy link
Member

Closing this PR as it has not been updated for some time. The issue request will be kept open and will continue to track the fix here.

@l3ku
Copy link
Author

l3ku commented Sep 5, 2023

I resolved the issue since it seems that this issue no longer exists due to a change in the AWS SageMaker APIs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can not set endpoint environment variables when deploying a model package