-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
fix: add environment key to model container only if it is not empty #3457
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run all
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3457 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.17% 88.87% -0.30%
==========================================
Files 204 212 +8
Lines 18979 20482 +1503
==========================================
+ Hits 16924 18203 +1279
- Misses 2055 2279 +224
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run all
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run all
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run all
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run unit-tests
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
…aws#3530) Currently the analysis configuration schema of SageMaker Clarify API allows the content_type configuration "image/jpeg" and "image/jpg", but the service side validation only accepts the former which is the registered MIME type for JPEG (see rfc3745 and JPEG specification). The commit removes the latter from the schema to avoid confusion and enable early API validation.
Co-authored-by: Anton Repushko <repuanto@amazon.com>
…st_feature_group (aws#3534) Co-authored-by: Eric Zou <zoueric@amazon.com> Co-authored-by: Yiming Zou <imingtsou@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Brandon Chatham <bdchatham@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: jiapinw <95885824+jiapinw@users.noreply.github.com>
bae3b8b
to
d000bdc
Compare
@l3ku can you help rebase this PR with latest master and resolve conflicts? |
Closing this PR as it has not been updated for some time. The issue request will be kept open and will continue to track the fix here. |
I resolved the issue since it seems that this issue no longer exists due to a change in the AWS SageMaker APIs. |
Issue #, if available:
#3397
Description of changes:
Removed defaulting to empty environment variables in the container definition to be provided to the CreateModelPackage API call. The empty dict caused a problem when trying to create a model (CreateModel API call) with some environment variables so that the model package can be used in an endpoint: environment variable map cannot be specified both at Model Package {} and Model {...}.
Fixes: #3397
Testing done:
Merge Checklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.General
Tests
unique_name_from_base
to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.