Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run sagemaker tests from GitHub Actions #275

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

wesk
Copy link
Contributor

@wesk wesk commented Jun 1, 2023

Initial PR to run the full test suite from GitHub Actions

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2023

Coverage report

The coverage rate went from 85.68% to 84.93% ⬇️

None of the new lines are part of the tested code. Therefore, there is no coverage data about them.

@wesk wesk marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2023 08:38
@wesk wesk requested a review from wistuba June 6, 2023 08:38
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ def load_config(scenario_file, model_file, updater_file, dataset_file):
default=12 * 3600,
help="Maximum execution time.",
)
parser.add_argument(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in both files, this argument is considered optional but if not provided, the script will fail

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, updated in next version

@wesk wesk requested a review from wistuba June 8, 2023 14:25
@wistuba wistuba merged commit f540367 into dev Jun 9, 2023
@wistuba wistuba deleted the 2023-06-01-sagemaker-tests branch June 9, 2023 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants