Added sureOfFailure() for those of us who prefer failure to success

[jasononeil]

Added sureOfFailure()

Basically to help with unit testing. You can verify that an API fails as expected under certain conditions with a similarly short syntax to checking that it passes as expected.

Feel free to decline if it is against your tastes. But I thought if it's useful to me it might be useful to others.

[back2dos]

If unit testing is the main motivation, I don't believe this should be added to Outcome itself.

It would be more appropriate to bundle this with whatever test framework one uses.

[jasononeil]

Fair point, I'll do it that way then...

I do appreciate that it was easier to send a pull request than to figure
out how to phrase this as a question. Thanks for the response :)

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Juraj Kirchheim
notifications@github.comwrote:

If unit testing is the main motivation, I don't believe this should be
added to Outcome itself.

It would be more appropriate to bundle this with whatever test framework
one uses.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/57#issuecomment-22946893
.

[back2dos]

Sure thing ;)

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:25 PM, jasononeil notifications@github.comwrote:

Fair point, I'll do it that way then...

I do appreciate that it was easier to send a pull request than to figure
out how to phrase this as a question. Thanks for the response :)

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Juraj Kirchheim
notifications@github.comwrote:

If unit testing is the main motivation, I don't believe this should be
added to Outcome itself.

It would be more appropriate to bundle this with whatever test framework
one uses.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/back2dos/tinkerbell/pull/57#issuecomment-22946893>
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/57#issuecomment-22948520
.