Skip to content

Conversation

aignas
Copy link
Collaborator

@aignas aignas commented Oct 11, 2024

With this change we can support ibazel for building our docs again
because we will just not have any sdists that are causing issues. This
limits the scope to only supporting whls at this time, but for the
time being it is the best solution.

Fixes #2223
Work towards #260

With this change we can support ibazel for building our docs again
because we will just not have any sdists that are causing issues. This
limits the scope to only supporting whls at this time, but for the
time being it is the best solution.

Fixes bazel-contrib#2223
Work towards bazel-contrib#260
@rickeylev rickeylev added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 11, 2024
@rickeylev
Copy link
Collaborator

Yay thanks!

@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 11, 2024
@rickeylev rickeylev added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into bazel-contrib:main with commit f6361e4 Oct 11, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bazel deps query with platform-specific pypi deps fails
2 participants